2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and pathological disagreement upon the cause of death in a teaching hospital: Analysis of 100 autopsy cases in a prospective study

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to analyze the concordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. For this purpose, 100 patients submitted to autopsy from July 2000 to April 2001 were studied prospectively. In all cases, clinicians gave the immediate and the underlying causes of death for patients dying under their care. The diagnoses were compared to the macroscopic autopsy diagnoses. Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was estimated. Sixty-four men and 36 women were submitted to autopsy. The most freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis regarding the underlying cause of death is estimated at 75 to 90 %, based upon several hospital autopsy validation studies [ 2 , 4 , 6 , 21 ]. However, some studies have noted that the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of the immediate cause of death is lower than that of the primary cause of death, based upon hospital autopsy data [ 22 24 ]. Recent literature indicates that the correspondence rate of the immediate cause of death as determined by postmortem CT and hospital autopsy reaches approximately 70 % [ 25 , 26 ], indicating that the accuracy of the determination of the immediate cause of death by postmortem CT is superior to that by clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis regarding the underlying cause of death is estimated at 75 to 90 %, based upon several hospital autopsy validation studies [ 2 , 4 , 6 , 21 ]. However, some studies have noted that the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of the immediate cause of death is lower than that of the primary cause of death, based upon hospital autopsy data [ 22 24 ]. Recent literature indicates that the correspondence rate of the immediate cause of death as determined by postmortem CT and hospital autopsy reaches approximately 70 % [ 25 , 26 ], indicating that the accuracy of the determination of the immediate cause of death by postmortem CT is superior to that by clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over one-fifth of clinically unexpected autopsy findings can be correctly diagnosed only by histological examination. [13][14] The aim of present study was to identify the various histopathological lesions of the heart found incidentally and play a major role as a cause of death in cases of sudden death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the advances in medical technologies, as well as economic and legal reasons are cited as justifications for this decline 3 . However, autopsy is still one of the most reliable methods to validate clinical diagnoses 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%