2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.693104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Pharmacologic Differences of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

Abstract: Targeted therapies such as Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have improved the prognosis of metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer by combating the resistance seen with traditional endocrine therapy. The three approved agents currently in the market are palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Besides the overall similarities associated with CDK4/6 inhibition, there are differences between the three approved agents that may explain the differences noted in unique clinical sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite overlap in on-target hematological toxicities, it is important to note that approved CDK4/6i have reportedly different pharmacological activity and overall toxicity profiles 41 43 , which may facilitate treatment choice, particularly in ICI combination regimens. For example, palbociclib and ribociclib have relatively lower off-target toxicities (notably gastrointestinal) than abemaciclib, while the frequency of hepatotoxicity is highest for ribociclib 44 .…”
Section: Boosting Response Rates To Icimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite overlap in on-target hematological toxicities, it is important to note that approved CDK4/6i have reportedly different pharmacological activity and overall toxicity profiles 41 43 , which may facilitate treatment choice, particularly in ICI combination regimens. For example, palbociclib and ribociclib have relatively lower off-target toxicities (notably gastrointestinal) than abemaciclib, while the frequency of hepatotoxicity is highest for ribociclib 44 .…”
Section: Boosting Response Rates To Icimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administration is for 21 days followed by a break of one week for neutrophil count recovery. In comparison, the half-life of abemaciclib is <24 h. It induces relatively less myelosuppression and is dosed twice daily [ 120 ] Palbociclib and ribociclib have minimal GI toxicities compared to abemaciclib, which has extensive GI toxicities [ 121 ]. However, abemaciclib-mediated bone marrow toxicity is less serious than palbociclib and ribociclib-mediated bone marrow toxicities [ 120 ].…”
Section: Inhibition Of Cyclin-dependent Kinases 4/6 (Cdk4/6) As a Sou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the half-life of abemaciclib is <24 h. It induces relatively less myelosuppression and is dosed twice daily [ 120 ] Palbociclib and ribociclib have minimal GI toxicities compared to abemaciclib, which has extensive GI toxicities [ 121 ]. However, abemaciclib-mediated bone marrow toxicity is less serious than palbociclib and ribociclib-mediated bone marrow toxicities [ 120 ]. The rate of hematological toxicity, mainly neutropenia, is higher for palbociclib and ribociclib [ 122 ].…”
Section: Inhibition Of Cyclin-dependent Kinases 4/6 (Cdk4/6) As a Sou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combinations have significantly improved clinical outcomes when compared to anti-estrogen monotherapy, as demonstrated by the randomized phase III trials PALOMA, MONALEESA, and MONARCH [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Although these drugs have reported comparable clinical benefits, there are unique differences in their substrate selectivity and pharmacodynamics [ 17 , 18 , 19 ] that could explain the varying differences observed in certain clinical settings. For example, abemaciclib is the only CDKi also approved as a monotherapy in the metastatic setting, and promising data support its use in the adjuvant setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%