2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and procedural predictors and short-term survival of the patients with no reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pathophysiology of the no-reflow phenomenon is complex, and a series of consistent data has [ 27 , 28 ] clearly shown that the no-reflow phenomenon has a strong negative effect on the outcome. In a population-based global registry, the NCDR study reported [ 29 ] that the no-reflow phenomenon is associated with an increased risk of adverse postprocedure hospital course including higher in-hospitality mortality (6.8% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.01), cerebrovascular accident (1.5% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), postprocedure bleeding (2.3% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.009), and cardiogenic shock (3.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.011). The no-reflow phenomenon is a process in which prolonged ischemia caused changes in endothelial cells, and optimal treatment of hyperglycemia is a significant target in preventing [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathophysiology of the no-reflow phenomenon is complex, and a series of consistent data has [ 27 , 28 ] clearly shown that the no-reflow phenomenon has a strong negative effect on the outcome. In a population-based global registry, the NCDR study reported [ 29 ] that the no-reflow phenomenon is associated with an increased risk of adverse postprocedure hospital course including higher in-hospitality mortality (6.8% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.01), cerebrovascular accident (1.5% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), postprocedure bleeding (2.3% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.009), and cardiogenic shock (3.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.011). The no-reflow phenomenon is a process in which prolonged ischemia caused changes in endothelial cells, and optimal treatment of hyperglycemia is a significant target in preventing [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Del Turco and Colleagues [9] demonstrated that elderly patients (>65 years) suffer from higher rates of no-reflow, attributable to a more pronounced pro-inflammatory state, defined by presence of higher mean values of fibrinogen, brain natriuretic peptide, leukocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C reactive protein-albumin ratio. Moreover, in a large cohort of patients undergoing pPCI, Ashraf et al [10], found that age, diabetes, prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting, higher thrombus burden and longer lesion length were independent predictors of no-reflow. Corroborating the idea that more pronounced the patient-related thrombotic diathesis, higher the risk of suboptimal reperfusion, Kaya et al [11] showed that the presence of atrial fibrillation is associated with 2-fold increase of risk to develop no-reflow in STEMI patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of adverse events in this cohort was relatively much higher than the outcomes of primary PCI that were previously reported in large registry-based studies from our population. The reported in-hospital rate of mortality and heart failure ranged from 2.2% to 3.04% and 0.7% to 0.9%, respectively, with cardiogenic shock up to 1.3% [ 16 - 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%