Erionite Studies in Custer National Forest Daniel Farcas Chapter 1. Introduction to erionite Erionite is an emerging naturally-occurring carcinogen that through continued and frequent exposure can lead to mesothelioma. Erionite exposure is mostly environmental and it affects individuals that live in areas where a natural deposit of the mineral exists. Chapter 2. What is mesothelioma? Why should I should be afraid? How do you calculate the risk of mesothelioma? What are the results? Mesothelioma, a rare cancer and the most dreaded asbestos-related disease affects the lining of the chest cavity and extremely debilitating and terminal. Rates of Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) are dependent on exposure times, concentrations, smoking, age of first exposure, etc. Although there is currently no proof of emerging erionite-related illnesses in the U.S., mesothelioma normally takes 30 to 50 years to develop. In this chapter, a preliminary risk assessment calculation was conducted considering time weighting factors for different activities and exposure years based on the expected age of first exposure according to EPA's excess lifetime cancer risks (ELCRs). The results show an increased probability of mesothelioma occurrence as exposure is prolonged, ranging from 2 to 26 cases in 10,000 individual exposure. This is higher than EPA's acceptability risk standard of 1:10,000. Chapter 3. How do you find these fibers in the environment? How do you separate them? How do you identify them? What was found? Asbestos or asbestos-like fibers (erionite) may be present in trace quantities in the environment which are non-detectible with the current analytical techniques. A recent advance in technology, the Fluidized Bed Asbestos Segregator (FBAS), is enabling us to identify and measure very small concentrations of erionite and asbestos in soil. This technique effectively and efficiently separates out erionite fibers from sampled soils while maintaining the integrity of the erionite fibers. Thus, the true structural characteristics and quantity of erionite fibers in the soils can be determined. The results show that traces of erionite in the analyzed soil samples, although well below the detection limit of 1% by traditional PCM/PLM methods, were reliably detected by the FBAS method and identified by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) / Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis.