2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of Off-Pump Coronary Surgery at 12 Months Follow-Up: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This absolute difference is comparable to those in other trials that have reported absolute differences ranging from 4.0% to 10.0%, all favoring on-pump CABG. 6,9,10,18,19 The 1-year patency rates for arterial and SVG conduits in ROOBY compare favorably with other reports, supporting the quality and expertise of the participating surgeons. 16,20,21 Complete revascularization is always the ideal goal of a CABG procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This absolute difference is comparable to those in other trials that have reported absolute differences ranging from 4.0% to 10.0%, all favoring on-pump CABG. 6,9,10,18,19 The 1-year patency rates for arterial and SVG conduits in ROOBY compare favorably with other reports, supporting the quality and expertise of the participating surgeons. 16,20,21 Complete revascularization is always the ideal goal of a CABG procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A direct comparison of the quality of arterial patency in the ROOBY trial and other studies is difficult because most other studies have reported only the combined FitzGibbon A and B patency rates or the open graft rate, failing to make the important distinction between the widely patent FitzGibbon A graft and the flow-limited, stenotic FitzGibbon B graft. 4,6,9,10,18,19 The absolute difference in SVG patency between arms was 7.2% better with on-pump CABG (PϽ0.001). This absolute difference is comparable to those in other trials that have reported absolute differences ranging from 4.0% to 10.0%, all favoring on-pump CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the randomised studies were ranked at Level 2 (moderate quality) with four studies at Level 3 (high quality) [21,23,29,31]. The 3 PSM studies [32 -34] were ranked at Level 1 (low quality).…”
Section: Selected Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significantly lowered patency for saphenous vein grafts than for internal thoracic artery grafts was suggested to result from the type of graft, presence of hyperlipidemia, the exposure and quality of stabilization, and increased procoagulant activity in OPCAB patients [6,11]. Although some studies demonstrated similar early vein graft patencies between OPCAB and conventional CABG [12][13][14], other meta-analysis using five randomized studies showed that OPCAB significantly increased the risk of graft failure, with the odds of graft occlusion 51% higher within the first postoperative year [5]. Those differences were mainly attributable to the lower saphenous vein or radial artery graft patency rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%