Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of All-Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure With Modified Suture Button Fixation: Excellent Bone Healing With a Low Complication Rate

Shao, Zhenxing; Zhao, Yuqing; Luo, Huan; Jiang, Yanfang; Song, Qingfa; Xu, Changwu; Cui, Guoqing

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.020

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The clinical score results did not difer signiicantly in study. Both procedures lead to suicient clinical results, as shown before [5,7,21,32]. Other clinical trials comparing glenoid reconstruction with the Latarjet procedure in an open fashion were not able to show a diference for the main outcome measurement tool, the WOSI score [11,14,27].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

The arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss shows similar clinical results after Latarjet procedure and iliac crest autograft transfer

Bockmann,

Nebelung,

Gröger

et al. 2023

Knee surg. sports traumatol. arthrosc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Recurrent anterior shoulder instability caused by critical bone loss of the glenoid is a challenging condition for shoulder surgeons. The purpose of this prospective multicenter trial was to compare the arthroscopic transfer of the coracoid process (Latarjet procedure) with the arthroscopic reconstruction of the glenoid using iliac crest autografts. Methods A prospective multi-center trial was performed in nine orthopaedic centres in Austria, Germany and Switzerland between July 2015 and August 2021. Patients were prospectively enrolled and received either an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure or an arthroscopic iliac crest graft transfer. Standardized follow-up after 6 months and mimimum 24 months included range of motion, Western Ontario stability index (WOSI), Rowe score and subjective shoulder value (SSV). All complications were recorded. Results 177 patients (group Latarjet procedure: n = 110, group iliac crest graft: n = 67) were included in the study. WOSI (n.s.), SSV (n.s.) and Rowe score (n.s.) showed no diference at inal follow-up. 10 complications were seen in group Latarjet procedure and 5 in group iliac crest graft; the frequency of complications did not difer between the two groups (n.s.). ConclusionThe arthrosopic Latarjet procedure and arthroscopic iliac crest graft transfer lead to comparable results regarding clinical scores, frequency of recurrent dislocations and complication rates. Level of evidence Level II. Keywords Glenoid bone loss • Recurrent anterior shoulder instability • Latarjet • Iliac crestBenjamin Bockmann and Wolfgang Nebelung contributed equally to the manuscript.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

The arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss shows similar clinical results after Latarjet procedure and iliac crest autograft transfer

Bockmann,

Nebelung,

Gröger

et al. 2023

Knee surg. sports traumatol. arthrosc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A further 87 studies were excluded after full‐text review. This left 29 eligible studies [1, 7, 8, 11, 14, 16–18, 23, 24, 29–32, 38, 40–45, 47, 48, 53, 55–59] of which 16 assessed arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, 13 assessed arthroscopic Latarjet (Tables 1 and 2). All studies reported preoperative glenoid bone loss: 21 reported mean preoperative glenoid bone loss, of which 4 created subgroups of glenoid bone loss and reported the mean loss of each subgroup, while 8 used a threshold of glenoid bone loss as a part of their inclusion criteria.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic Latarjet yields better union and prevention of instability compared to arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability: a systematic review

Billaud,

Baverel,

van Rooij

et al. 2023

Knee surg. sports traumatol. arthrosc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To determine whether arthroscopic Latarjet procedure or arthroscopic bony Bankart repair provide better outcomes in terms of rates of recurrent instability, non-union and complications, as well as clinical scores and range of motion. Methods An electronic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane databases, applying the following keywords: "Arthroscopic bony Bankart" OR "Arthroscopic osseous Bankart" AND "Arthroscopic Latarjet" OR "Arthroscopic coracoid bone block". ResultsThe systematic search returned 1465 records, of which 29 were included (arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, n = 16; arthroscopic Latarjet, n = 13). 37 datasets were included for data extraction, on 1483 shoulders. Compared to arthroscopic Latarjet, arthroscopic bony Bankart repair had significantly higher instability rates (0.14; CI 0.10-0.18; vs 0.04; CI 0.02-0.06), significantly lower union rates (0.63; CI 0.28-0.91 vs 0.98; CI 0.93-1.00), and significantly lower pain on VAS (0.42; CI 0.17-0.67 vs 1.17; CI 0.96-1.38). There were no significant differences in preoperative glenoid bone loss, follow-up, complication rate, ROWE score, ASES score, external rotation, and anterior forward elevation between arthroscopic Latarjet and arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. Conclusion Compared to arthroscopic Latarjet, arthroscopic bony Bankart repair results in significantly (i) higher rates of recurrent instability (14% vs 4%), (ii) lower union rates (63% vs 98%), but (iii) slightly lower pain on VAS (0.45 vs 1.17). There were no differences in complication rates, clinical scores, or postoperative ranges of motion. Level of evidence IV.

show abstract

“…The benefit of suture buttons during the Latarjet procedure has also been described by other authors. 33 , 34 Recently, Hachem et al. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 described a similar concept for the open and arthroscopic Latarjet fixation by using metal-free FiberTape Cerclage sutures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Subscapularis-Sparing “Flipped Latarjet” Procedure

Raiss,

Campagnoli,

Bachmaier

et al. 2024

Arthroscopy Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of All-Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure With Modified Suture Button Fixation: Excellent Bone Healing With a Low Complication Rate

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

The arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss shows similar clinical results after Latarjet procedure and iliac crest autograft transfer

The arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss shows similar clinical results after Latarjet procedure and iliac crest autograft transfer

Arthroscopic Latarjet yields better union and prevention of instability compared to arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability: a systematic review

The Subscapularis-Sparing “Flipped Latarjet” Procedure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About