2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Safety Outcomes of Oral Antithrombotics for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved efficacy-safety profiles compared with warfarin of apixaban and other NOACs has been demonstrated recently in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in phase III clinical studies (Granger et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2015;Morais and De Caterina, 2016). The use of apixaban to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Improved efficacy-safety profiles compared with warfarin of apixaban and other NOACs has been demonstrated recently in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in phase III clinical studies (Granger et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2015;Morais and De Caterina, 2016). The use of apixaban to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since warfarin and the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are the currently available options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (Lin et al, 2015) and recent phase III clinical studies indicate that NOACs resulted in an overall better efficacy-safety profile than warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (Lin et al, 2015;Morais and De Caterina, 2016), we aimed to investigate the effects of apixaban as a representative example for the NOAC class on cerebral MES in our recently established preclinical model of cerebral MES. Apixaban was selected for this study because its in vitro and in vivo properties have been extensively characterized, along with efficacy assessment in various rabbit models of thrombosis and hemostasis for translational research (Pinto et al, 2007;Wong et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, management of VKA therapy is complicated due to the narrow therapeutic index, slow onset and offset of action, and numerous dietary and drug interactions. In recent years, a new class of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs; including direct thrombin receptor inhibitor dabigatran, and FXa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban) were approved for SPAF based on their similar or superior benefit-risk profiles compared with warfarin (Granger et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2015;Morais and De Caterina, 2016). Nevertheless, NOACs are still associated with a significant bleeding risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and safety outcomes of oral antithrombotics for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in younger (65 - 74 years) and older (≥ 75 years) elderly [9]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between DOACs included dabigatran, 110 mg, dabigatran, 150 mg, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban; however, this comparison demonstrated no difference in risk of SSE. Analysis of ischemic stroke included 16 RCTs (179,915 patient-years) and six NRSs (363,322 patient-years) [9]. In this analysis, DOACs exhibited an even smaller benefit for the outcome of ischemic stroke relative to SSE when compared to warfarin.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%