2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03973-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical application of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology for performing the scans has previously been reported. 21 Mesh was determined by its characteristic honeycomb -like appearance ( This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodology for performing the scans has previously been reported. 21 Mesh was determined by its characteristic honeycomb -like appearance ( This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Analysis of the 3D volume allows assessment of mesh morphology and the adjacent pelvic anatomy, providing patients and clinicians the opportunity to visualise the entire course of the pelvic floor mesh. 21 We hypothesise that MUS location can contribute to patient symptoms and therefore ultrasound is a useful adjunctive investigation when assessing women presenting with complications following mesh incontinence surgery. The objective is to present the characteristics of women attending a tertiary urogynaecology pelvic floor scan clinic and examine the association between 2D perineal and 3D endovaginal ultrasound findings and their symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transobturator tapes can be identified because the arms of the tape go lateral, in a ‘seagull’ shape, whilst retropubic transvaginal tapes gives a U-shaped image, with the arms travelling towards the pubic symphysis. 22 Some radiologists advocate that the arms of the mesh are difficult to identify because of a longer distance from the transducer, 23 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could surpass ultrasound in this scenario.…”
Section: Diagnostic Pathway For Urinary Incontinence Mesh-related Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical appearance is that of a honeycomb structure (Figure 2), although with time, as fibrosis and scarring take place, it might lose this common arrangement. 22 Ultrasound gives information regarding mesh relation to the urethra and vaginal wall, 15 which could help determine the type of mesh placed in case of unknown tape insertion surgery details. Transobturator tapes can be identified because the arms of the tape go lateral, in a ‘seagull’ shape, whilst retropubic transvaginal tapes gives a U-shaped image, with the arms travelling towards the pubic symphysis.…”
Section: Diagnostic Pathway For Urinary Incontinence Mesh-related Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Это важное дополнение к диагностическим мероприятиям, формирующим объективную картину заболевания (УЗИ, электромиография, МРТ) [6,7]. «Золотым стандартом» диагностики в настоящее время считается трансперинеальная сонография в режиме 3D, функциональные особенности которой позволяют оценить целостность структур тазового дна на том же уровне, что и МРТ, но при более низкой стоимости [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified