2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-5616(03)00119-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical application of a hemoglobin-based oxygen-carrying solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serious concerns associated with transfusion of allogeneic blood or pRBCs in humans, such as transmittable diseases, immunologic incompatibility, transportation and storage difficulties, short shelf‐life, supply shortage, and costs stimulated the search for blood substitutes that would possess oxygen carrying in addition to volume expanding capacity and thus have the potential to serve as an ‘ideal’ resuscitation fluid for treatment of acute blood loss and anemia 143–146 . Over the past three or more decades numerous allogeneic and xenogeneic, stroma‐free, ultra‐purified tetrameric hemoglobin solutions, also called HBOCs, have been developed to overcome these problems, however, with mixed success as subsequent pre‐clinical and clinical investigations demonstrated 89,147–156 . Although a vast spectrum of in vitro experiments, laboratory models, and human clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of these solutions as volume expanders and oxygen carriers, these studies also revealed significant problems associated with administration of HBOCs 89,147,149–151,153–162 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Serious concerns associated with transfusion of allogeneic blood or pRBCs in humans, such as transmittable diseases, immunologic incompatibility, transportation and storage difficulties, short shelf‐life, supply shortage, and costs stimulated the search for blood substitutes that would possess oxygen carrying in addition to volume expanding capacity and thus have the potential to serve as an ‘ideal’ resuscitation fluid for treatment of acute blood loss and anemia 143–146 . Over the past three or more decades numerous allogeneic and xenogeneic, stroma‐free, ultra‐purified tetrameric hemoglobin solutions, also called HBOCs, have been developed to overcome these problems, however, with mixed success as subsequent pre‐clinical and clinical investigations demonstrated 89,147–156 . Although a vast spectrum of in vitro experiments, laboratory models, and human clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of these solutions as volume expanders and oxygen carriers, these studies also revealed significant problems associated with administration of HBOCs 89,147,149–151,153–162 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the much shorter plasma residence time of these solutions compared with transfused red blood cells has been a concern and limiting factor for their use in trauma and persistent anemia 147,148 . It is beyond the scope of this report to provide a comprehensive review of the countless animal and human studies that have been conducted with various HBOCs over the years, thus the interested reader may consult the many recently published reviews for more details 89,147–156,163 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is not surprising given the fact that the HBOC, Oxyglobin, has a hemoglobin concentration of 13 g/dL, an osmolality of 300, and a colloid osmotic pressure of 43 mmHg 1. Administration of replacement fluid with this combination of hyper-osmolality and a 13 g/dL hemoglobin concentration, which is only slightly above that of the animals following acute hemorrhage (intravascular post hemorrhage hemoglobin concentration, averaged 12.1±0.4 g/dL compared to prehemorrhage baseline values of 14.8±0.4 g/dL), would be expected to draw fluid into the vascular space resulting in substantial increases in intravascular volume, but should cause only slight (if any) increases in intravascular hemoglobin concentration 68,20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%