2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical application of Magnetic resonance elastography in hepatocellular carcinoma: from diagnosis to prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While MRE is already a useful tool for assessing liver stiffness ( 27 ), post-acquisition motion correction of liver MRE may further enhance measurement accuracy. This increased accuracy would be useful in the probing of fibrotic heterogeneity ( 28 ) or the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma in which small tumors (less than 1 cm) are often unable to be measured ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MRE is already a useful tool for assessing liver stiffness ( 27 ), post-acquisition motion correction of liver MRE may further enhance measurement accuracy. This increased accuracy would be useful in the probing of fibrotic heterogeneity ( 28 ) or the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma in which small tumors (less than 1 cm) are often unable to be measured ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver fibrosis is the most important factor associated with HCC development and prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and other chronic hepatitis. 20 , 21 , 22 Therefore, accurate evaluation of liver fibrosis is crucial in clinical practice. Several noninvasive modalities for liver fibrosis assessment have been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages are represented by the fact that this method is not applicable in case of iron overload, requires an MRI facility, and the cost of this procedure. MRE seems to be a promising technique capable of differentiating benign and malignant focal lesions without the use of an intravenous contrast agent [ 43 ]. The study by Venkatesh et al [ 44 ] suggests that a cutoff value of 5.0 kPa may be very accurate (accuracy = 100%) for differentiating benign focal masses from malignant tumors.…”
Section: New Frontiers Of Non-invasive Evaluation Of Patients With He...mentioning
confidence: 99%