Background: Tumor markers are used to monitor disease progression and determine the responsiveness to cancer treatment. However, there are no standardized criteria for monitoring serial tumor marker measurements. Herein, we have developed our own monitoring system for interpreting changes in tumor markers using overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine whether the changes are significant.Methods: Two-year data, including 117,289 results for 11 tumor markers in our laboratory, were analyzed. The distributions of absolutely delta% and cut-off values for certain percentiles were calculated. CI ranges for each tumor marker were set based on biological variation, and data were analyzed for each patient assessed at health check-ups and clinics, individually and overall.Results: Most tumor markers had low indices of individuality, with between inter-individual variability. The 95th percentile cut-offs for each tumor marker were much higher in the health check-up group than in the clinic group. In decreasing order, the percentages of results with no overlap in 95% CIs were thyroglobulin antigen, 14.9%; protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA), 11.9%; prostate-specific antigen, 9.8%; and cancer antigen 72-4, 8.7%. After correction using the reference interval, the percentages decreased to less than 5%, except for PIVKA (10.9%).Conclusions: We suggest that our own monitoring system can serve as a criterion for delta check and auto-verification of tumor markers. Further studies are required to validate and demonstrate this concept in real clinical situations using actual clinical data reflecting disease progression in cancer patients and responsiveness to cancer treatment.