2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical assessment and brain findings in a cohort of mothers, fetuses and infants infected with ZIKA virus

Abstract: Congenital microcephaly is not an optimal screening method for congenital Zika virus syndrome, because it may not accompany other evident and preceding brain findings; microcephaly could be an endpoint of the disease that results from progressive changes that are related to brain volume loss. Long-term studies are needed to understand the clinical and developmental relevance of these findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
122
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcifications caused by focal necrosis are common in CZS. These calcifications are often weakly echogenic without any posterior shadowing on prenatal US and can intensify in echogenicity and size during pregnancy, which may lead to multiple punctiform macro‐calcifications . Prevalence of calcifications in CZS is 71% to 92% …”
Section: Congenital Zikv Syndromementioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calcifications caused by focal necrosis are common in CZS. These calcifications are often weakly echogenic without any posterior shadowing on prenatal US and can intensify in echogenicity and size during pregnancy, which may lead to multiple punctiform macro‐calcifications . Prevalence of calcifications in CZS is 71% to 92% …”
Section: Congenital Zikv Syndromementioning
confidence: 88%
“…In our and others experience, microcephaly is always associated with other findings and seems to be the consequence of viral brain injury. Prevalence of microcephaly in CZS is 33.3% to 64 %, but brain volume loss seems to be much more frequent (92% of cases) …”
Section: Congenital Zikv Syndromementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(20) This definition was consistent with standards for diagnosing microcephaly outside of ZIKV exposure and designed to minimize the chance that a fetus with a constitutionally small head would be labeled as microcephalic. (21) A less conservative definition was adopted by the WHO and the International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, which chose to define ZIKV-associated microcephaly as a HC less than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean (Z-score ≤ −2 SD). (22) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, USA) similarly defined ZIKV-associated microcephaly as a fetal or neonatal HC less than 2 SD below the mean or the 3 rd centile for gestational age.…”
Section: Congenital Zika Syndrome and Diagnostic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25) Others reported a 10% rate of a normal HC in the context of significant brain anomalies. (21, 26) Note that a sex-independent threshold for microcephaly (single cutoff for neonatal HC by the Integrowth-21 st sonographic standard), is more likely to label female infants as microcephalic, because girls tend to have smaller heads than boys. (27)…”
Section: Congenital Zika Syndrome and Diagnostic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%