2021
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical assessment of geometric distortion for a 0.35T MR‐guided radiotherapy system

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, significant image artifacts were observed during gantry rotation using bSSFP MRI (Crijns andRaaymakers 2014, Gach et al 2019). Off-resonances from magnetic field inhomogeneities, central frequency offsets, gradient nonlinearities, and B 0 eddy currents cause geometric distortion, imaging isocenter shift, signal heterogeneity, and image blurring (Dharmakumar et al 2007, Torfeh et al 2016, Ginn et al 2017, Neylon et al 2021. Geometric distortion and isocenter variation in 3D bSSFP imaging for radiotherapy planning and daily setup and their several correction parameters have been investigated previously (Torfeh et al 2016, Shan et al 2020, Marasini et al 2022, Lotey et al 2023.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significant image artifacts were observed during gantry rotation using bSSFP MRI (Crijns andRaaymakers 2014, Gach et al 2019). Off-resonances from magnetic field inhomogeneities, central frequency offsets, gradient nonlinearities, and B 0 eddy currents cause geometric distortion, imaging isocenter shift, signal heterogeneity, and image blurring (Dharmakumar et al 2007, Torfeh et al 2016, Ginn et al 2017, Neylon et al 2021. Geometric distortion and isocenter variation in 3D bSSFP imaging for radiotherapy planning and daily setup and their several correction parameters have been investigated previously (Torfeh et al 2016, Shan et al 2020, Marasini et al 2022, Lotey et al 2023.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine‐specific distortions originate from the field inhomogeneity and gradient non‐linearity. In state‐of‐the‐art MRI scanners, those distortions are negligible, especially for brain imaging with small volume close to the MRI scanner isocenter 5,6 . On the other hand, patient‐specific geometrical distortions (PSD) are due to the susceptibility changes at the air‐tissue boundaries and water/fat frequency shift resulting from the chemical shift artifact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In state‐of‐the‐art MRI scanners, those distortions are negligible, especially for brain imaging with small volume close to the MRI scanner isocenter. 5 , 6 On the other hand, patient‐specific geometrical distortions (PSD) are due to the susceptibility changes at the air‐tissue boundaries and water/fat frequency shift resulting from the chemical shift artifact. The magnetic susceptibility changes are not negligible at the air‐tissue interfaces, even when MRI sequences with a modified high bandwidth (BW) are utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%