2007
DOI: 10.1080/00365590701673625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and primary treatment of prostate cancer in Sweden between 1996 and 2005

Abstract: All changes in the register seen over time are consistent with increased diagnostic activity, especially PSA testing, resulting in an increased number of cases with early disease, predominantly tumors in category T1c. The patterns of diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer vary considerably in different parts of Sweden. The NPCR continues to be an important source for research, epidemiological surveillance of the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prostate-specific antigen testing may be considered to introduce bias, as this screening technique may only detect certain types of tumour. There is no official recommendation in Sweden on PSA testing as part of health checkups or for screening purposes in men without lower urinary tract symptoms (Adolfsson et al, 2007), hence any bias that may be introduced by PSA is of limited relevance in our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prostate-specific antigen testing may be considered to introduce bias, as this screening technique may only detect certain types of tumour. There is no official recommendation in Sweden on PSA testing as part of health checkups or for screening purposes in men without lower urinary tract symptoms (Adolfsson et al, 2007), hence any bias that may be introduced by PSA is of limited relevance in our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These features of the study substantially reduce the potential risk of recall and selection biases, and, importantly, increase the generalisability of the study findings. According to the National Prostate Cancer Register data, the most common cause of diagnosis in Sweden was clinical symptom (about 80% in our data), followed by health checkup (Adolfsson et al, 2007). Prostate-specific antigen testing may be considered to introduce bias, as this screening technique may only detect certain types of tumour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other three populations were from our collaborative research group, including a hospital-based case series from the JHH, and two populationbased studies based on the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden; a case-control study; CAncer Prostate in Sweden (CAPS) (41,26), and a case series of PCa patients treated for localized PCa (PROCAP) (42,43).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] In brief, the NPCR contains data on tumour characteristics according to the tumour, node status, metastasis TNM classification, 18 histological grade, date of diagnosis, serum levels of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis, and primary treatment delivered or decided within 6 months after diagnosis for 98% of all men with prostate cancer in Sweden since 1998. In this study NPCR was linked to Cause of Death Register, the Prescribed Drug Register, the National Hospital Discharge Register and the Day Surgery Register.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%