2020
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and rate of dilatation in Turner syndrome patients treated for aortic dilatation

Abstract: Turner syndrome is associated with an increased risk of aortic aneurysms and dissection. Recent 2017 clinical care guidelines recommend medical therapy to treat aortic dilatation, although whether this slows dilatation is unknown. We aimed to describe a pre‐guideline cohort of Turner syndrome patients with aortic dilatation, the rate of dilatation following diagnosis, and post therapy dilatation rates. We conducted a retrospective review of Turner syndrome patients with a dilated aortic root or ascending aorta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk factor analysis showed a typical distribution of karyotype, proportion of BAV, and CoA in our population compared to the existing literature. The most important risk factor, as already widely established in the adult population, seems to be the bicuspid AV, being responsible for most of the cases with abnormal Z -scores [ 25 ]. One third of our BAV patients showed dilatation at least at one measuring level at baseline and this fraction increased to about 50% at the end of the observation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factor analysis showed a typical distribution of karyotype, proportion of BAV, and CoA in our population compared to the existing literature. The most important risk factor, as already widely established in the adult population, seems to be the bicuspid AV, being responsible for most of the cases with abnormal Z -scores [ 25 ]. One third of our BAV patients showed dilatation at least at one measuring level at baseline and this fraction increased to about 50% at the end of the observation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a specific study comparing TS patients with adult women of the same height without TS, it is difficult to define an at-risk aortic diameter threshold. According to published findings, aortic diameter values exceeding 33 mm for the aortic sinus and 31 mm for the ascending aorta are considered, by some, to be pathological [ 65 ]. For a mean body surface area of 1.6 m 2 , an indexed ascending aortic diameter > 25 mm/m 2 corresponds to a diameter of 40 mm, i.e.…”
Section: Screening and Management Of Associated Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%