2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and risk of second primary lung cancer after cervical cancer: A population-based study

Abstract: Background Lung cancer is increasingly common as a second primary malignancy. However, the clinical characteristics of second primary non-small cell lung cancer after cervical cancer (CC-NSCLC) compared with first primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC1) is unknown. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry between 1998 and 2010 was used to conduct a large population-based cohort analysis. The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as prognostic data, were sys… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung metastasis was a unique common risk and prognostic factor. To uncover clinical-specific or common risk and prognostic factors for different metastatic sites among the cervical cancer population, we collected and compared clinical factors that were associated with cervical cancer with distant metastases, based on previous studies using the SEER database [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 ]. Late tumor stage was considered as a common potential risk factor for different metastatic sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lung metastasis was a unique common risk and prognostic factor. To uncover clinical-specific or common risk and prognostic factors for different metastatic sites among the cervical cancer population, we collected and compared clinical factors that were associated with cervical cancer with distant metastases, based on previous studies using the SEER database [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 ]. Late tumor stage was considered as a common potential risk factor for different metastatic sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical cancer patients that presented both liver and lung metastases had a poor prognosis. It was not surprising that patients with multiple organ metastases had worse outcomes than single-site metastasis, which has been confirmed in many metastatic malignant tumors [ 6 , 11 ]. Considering that cervical cancer patients with different metastatic organs might benefit from individual treatment strategies [ 28 ], there are still scarce clinical risk and prognostic factors to predict the location and survival of different metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Better survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer have been reported due to advancements in the detection and treatment of the disease. However, with the growing number of cervical cancer survivors, primary second cancers in these patients pose a new challenge [ 10 ]. Compared to the general population, there is an increased incidence of a second primary malignancy in patients diagnosed and treated for cervical cancer [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical cancer metastasis occurs mainly via the lymphatic route ( 10 ). The most common sites of distant metastases are the lungs, bones, and liver, in order of priority ( 11 ). It is rare for cervical cancer to spread to the central nervous system, and very little research has been conducted on this subject ( 12 , 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%