“…Compared with IPAH patients and familial PAH individuals, patients with PAH associated with CTD have an older age of onset and exhibited worse prognosis in survival [6] Survival of patients with respiratory disease-related or congenital heart disease-related PAH in the modern treatment era is better than CTD-APAH [6,7]. Although clinical features, hemodynamic parameters, echocardiography patter, multi-spiral computer tomography findings, exercise capacity, and anti-nuclear antibody profiles were found as powerful factors predicted a development of PAH due to several diseases [8], the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and predictive value are derived from PAH patients with different comorbidities and specific complications associated with CTD, congenital heart disease and respiratory disease might be unacceptable [9]. In this context, taken into consideration pathophysiological heterogeneity of PAH to risk stratification based on biological markers (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, red cell distribution width, soluble endoglin, growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, C-reactive protein, pentraxin 3) reflected several faces of nature evolution of the disease might be useful and appears to be attractive [10][11][12][13].…”