Clinical characteristics, sepsis interventions and outcomes in the obese patients with septic shock: an international multicenter cohort study

Abstract

IntroductionData are sparse as to whether obesity influences the risk of death in critically ill patients with septic shock. We sought to examine the possible impact of obesity, as assessed by body mass index (BMI), on hospital mortality in septic shock patients.MethodsWe performed a nested cohort study within a retrospective database of patients with septic shock conducted in 28 medical centers in Canada, United States and Saudi Arabia between 1996 and 2008. Patients were classified according to the World Health Organization criteria for BMI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between obesity and hospital mortality.ResultsOf the 8,670 patients with septic shock, 2,882 (33.2%) had height and weight data recorded at ICU admission and constituted the study group. Obese patients were more likely to have skin and soft tissue infections and less likely to have pneumonia with predominantly Gram-positive microorganisms. Crystalloid and colloid resuscitation fluids in the first six hours were given at significantly lower volumes per kg in the obese and very obese patients compared to underweight and normal weight patients (for crystalloids: 55.0 ± 40.1 ml/kg for underweight, 43.2 ± 33.4 for normal BMI, 37.1 ± 30.8 for obese and 27.7 ± 22.0 for very obese). Antimicrobial doses per kg were also different among BMI groups. Crude analysis showed that obese and very obese patients had lower hospital mortality compared to normal weight patients (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.97 for obese and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85 for very obese patients). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and sepsis interventions, the association became non-significant (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.02 for obese and OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.04 for very obese).ConclusionsThe obesity paradox (lower mortality in the obese) documented in other populations is also observed in septic shock. This may be related in part to differences in patient characteristics. However, the true paradox may lie in the variations in the sepsis interventions, such as the administration of resuscitation fluids and antimicrobial therapy. Considering the obesity epidemic and its impact on critical care, further studies are warranted to examine whether a weight-based approach to common therapeutic interventions in septic shock influences outcome.

Incidence of high body mass index in critically ill cancer patients

“…However, in the context of critically ill oncologic patients with high BMI, the impact on mortality is unknown. Different reports have described that in patients with sepsis and septic shock, obesity is a protective factor against death (14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”

Norepinephrine Dosing in Obese and Nonobese Patients With Septic Shock

“…Recent studies [16][17][18][19] have indicated that the outcomes (ie, hospital mortality) and characteristics (ie, type of underlying infection) of critically ill obese patients differ from those of nonobese patients. These differences may be due to underlying pathophysiological mechanisms or differential use of therapies or suboptimal drug dosing.…”

Extremely obese patients treated with venovenous ECMO—an intensivist’s challenge

“…In 2014, 26% of adults worldwide were obese [1]. The proportion of extremely obese patients (BMI N 40 kg/m 2 ) in intensive care units varies between 2.8% and 6.8% [2][3][4][5][6][7]. A BMI higher than 40 kg/m 2 seems to be associated with an increased risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) along with greater morbidity, length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) [8].…”