2009
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-182782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characterization of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes as defined by the 2008 WHO classification system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
62
3
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
62
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It still remains controversial whether OS and DFS will be affected by MLD. We can found some other reports [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] supporting that MLD affected the prognosis of AML patients. However, if looking carefully into their results, they did not show that MLD was an independent prognostic factor in patient with AML.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It still remains controversial whether OS and DFS will be affected by MLD. We can found some other reports [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] supporting that MLD affected the prognosis of AML patients. However, if looking carefully into their results, they did not show that MLD was an independent prognostic factor in patient with AML.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, in patients with an unfavorable karyotype, dysplasia had no additional prognostic influence. Weinberg et al [12] suggested that AML-MRC (including with a history of MDS/MPN or with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities or with MLD rather than MLD-sole) was the independent prognostic factor. In Arber's study [13], AML patients with MLD was combined with therapy-related patients and then compared with AML-NOS patients, by which it was found that the prognosis was better in former group than the latter one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, AML with multilineage dysplasia has been associated with a poor prognosis. In our analysis, this variable was not significant by multivariate analysis, probably due to a strong correlation between multilineage dysplasia and older age (26).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In particular, most studies examining 'secondary acute myeloid leukemia' have not differentiated between cases following chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and those following myelodysplastic syndrome, and thus the particular features and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia following chronic myelomonocytic leukemia are not well described. [12][13][14][15][16] In this retrospective, multi-institutional study, we evaluated the clinicopathologic and genetic features of 38 patients with acute myeloid leukemia arising after a prior diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. We examined the outcome of these patients in comparison with patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia arising from a myelodysplastic syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%