2019
DOI: 10.1177/1833358319874008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical coding and the quality and integrity of health data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 Furthermore, clinical documentation standards often vary, which can introduce data quality issues. 8 - 10 Privacy requirements or inadequate data governance frameworks can also impede access to these data, limiting their actionability. 11 , 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 Furthermore, clinical documentation standards often vary, which can introduce data quality issues. 8 - 10 Privacy requirements or inadequate data governance frameworks can also impede access to these data, limiting their actionability. 11 , 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for new studies which test novel ways of applying sepsis diagnostic codes, methods of data linkage, and combination coding algorithms to improve the diagnostic accuracy of ICD-10 codes for sepsis. Since coding can be confounded by changing policies, other efforts such as clinical documentation improvement programs, continuous coder training and audits, and diagnosis cover sheets or financial incentives may also be considered (52–55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many variables influence the quality of coding practice. In a recent paper, Shepheard mentioned poor quality of clinical documentation, keeping up with clinical case definition, and the necessity of capturing all comorbidity and preexisting conditions as the main obstacles for clinical coders [ 1 ]. The quality of clinical documentation mainly influences coding practice; as Farhan J et al mentioned, "Major problems identified in coding were related to the quality of the medical record documentation rather than to the quality of the coding" [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%