1986
DOI: 10.1128/aac.29.5.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical comparative study on the activity of cefamandole in the treatment of serious staphylococcal infections caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains

Abstract: Ninety-two microbiologically documented staphylococcal infections were treated with cefamandole in an open comparative study on the clinical efficacy of this cephalosporin in the therapy of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. The majority of the episodes (86 of 92) were treated with cefamandole alone, and six were treated with cefamandole in association with other antibiotics. In the evaluable S. aureus inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35:21a, 1987) and cefuroxime have been associated with significantly fewer postoperative staphylococcal infections (11). In contrast, cefamandole has not been consistently effective against methicillin-resistant staphylococci either in experimental models of infection (6) or in clinical studies (2,4). These discrepant results may be due to differences in degrees of methicillin resistance among strains of staphylococci (7).…”
contrasting
confidence: 41%
“…35:21a, 1987) and cefuroxime have been associated with significantly fewer postoperative staphylococcal infections (11). In contrast, cefamandole has not been consistently effective against methicillin-resistant staphylococci either in experimental models of infection (6) or in clinical studies (2,4). These discrepant results may be due to differences in degrees of methicillin resistance among strains of staphylococci (7).…”
contrasting
confidence: 41%
“…This has led to the recommendation that vancomycin be used as the agent of choice for these infections. Yet, in some studies (11) cefamandole has been found to be effective clinically for a wide range of infections (excluding endocarditis) caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Our data support the results of the latter studies, although cross-resistance between methicillin and cephalosporin agents with staphylococci (1,18) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A favorable experience with cefamandole, often in combination with other drugs, against methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and S. aureus has been reported (64). Many of the infections, however, were of minor or moderate severity (e.g., skin or soft-tissue infection, some of which were attributed to coagulase-negative strains, and transient bacteremia) that may have responded as a result of other interventions (e.g., removal of infected intravascular device, surgical drainage).…”
Section: Fusidic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%