“…For example, measures of trauma-related voices should not only assess the number of voices, the frequency, loudness, duration, location, and clarity of voices, as well as the interference, distress, and emotional impact of voices, they should also assess the frequency and strength of both positively and negatively valenced voices to improve content validity. Similarly, although existing measures assess the frequency in which people comply with the demands of voices (e.g., Leishout & Goldberg, 2007), some trauma-affected individuals perceive voices to take command of their body (Fung et al, 2020), and future measures should be adapted to capture the full range of compliance-like behaviour.…”