2016
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical decision making – choosing between intuition, experience and scientific evidence

Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of national culture on firm risk-taking, using a comprehensive dataset covering 50,000 firms in 400 industries in 51 countries. Risk-taking is found to be higher for domestic firms in countries with low uncertainty aversion, low tolerance for hierarchical relationships, and high individualism. Domestic firms in such countries tend to take substantially more risk in industries which are more informationally opaque (e.g. finance, mining, IT). Risktaking by foreign firms is bes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows a high level of complexity due to the expectations of the patient, and the contemplations the health care professional must make in selecting a treatment that is not only effective, but additionally maximizes benefits and health-related quality of life of the patient while minimizing risks. Often the construction of a decision selecting a definite treatment option may be linked to empirical principles or experiences of the dentist, which explains why dental education or training affects the treatment choices of oral healthcare professionals [ 28 ]. This effect may arise from differences in the diagnosis or identification of certain conditions [ 29 ], the preferred decisions to treat these conditions according to the dentist’s awareness of the risks and progression of the disease, as well as the most appropriate procedure applied for treatment [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows a high level of complexity due to the expectations of the patient, and the contemplations the health care professional must make in selecting a treatment that is not only effective, but additionally maximizes benefits and health-related quality of life of the patient while minimizing risks. Often the construction of a decision selecting a definite treatment option may be linked to empirical principles or experiences of the dentist, which explains why dental education or training affects the treatment choices of oral healthcare professionals [ 28 ]. This effect may arise from differences in the diagnosis or identification of certain conditions [ 29 ], the preferred decisions to treat these conditions according to the dentist’s awareness of the risks and progression of the disease, as well as the most appropriate procedure applied for treatment [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-operatively, the decision-making process occurs irrespective of the surgical skills. It takes approximately five years for a new surgeon to adjust to care according to nuances at all stages [ 41 ]. The older surgeon may “read the game”, and will intuitively understand when to play the winners, possibly from a recollection of similar scenarios; an extrapolation of its sport analogy [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Albert Einstein said that the rational brain is a faithful servant and the intuitive brain is a sacred gift. But, the society that has been created more honours the servant and forgotten the gift itself [17], [18] In fact, the social and educational environment more emphasized in the rational brain rather than intuitive brain as a noble gift.…”
Section: B Intuitive Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%