1994
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/17.7.630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Diagnoses in 216 Insomnia Patients Using the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), DSM-IV and ICD-10 Categories: A Report From the APA/NIMH DSM-IV Field Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
1
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
101
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When more severe criteria are used, the prevalence rate vary less widely between 9% to 19% in the general population 1,11,[37][38][39] . These studies are not similar regarding the definition of insomnia and this is why it has been recommended to adopt a common classification (DSM-IV or ICSD) in epidemiology 16,29,36,[39][40][41] . In a recent review, Ohayon et al 36) have categorised the prevalence data of insomnia of over 40 epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Studies On General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When more severe criteria are used, the prevalence rate vary less widely between 9% to 19% in the general population 1,11,[37][38][39] . These studies are not similar regarding the definition of insomnia and this is why it has been recommended to adopt a common classification (DSM-IV or ICSD) in epidemiology 16,29,36,[39][40][41] . In a recent review, Ohayon et al 36) have categorised the prevalence data of insomnia of over 40 epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Studies On General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Furthermore, 10% to 15% of insomniacs are substance abusers. 3 The approach to a sleep complaint begins with a thorough sleep history.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of under-estimators of sleep in the present sample was 6.7%, which is similar to the general population 6.6%. 12 The gender distribution (female : male = 5 : 1) was commensurate with that of the participants in the overall trial. Lack of gender predilection in reverse paradoxical insomnia has been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%