1978
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197808000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical differentiation of conductive hearing loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
218
2
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
218
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, these animals have no normal auditory experience and model congenital bilateral profound hearing loss. Hair cell degeneration in these animals leads to subsequent degeneration of the primary afferent cochlear spiral ganglion (SG) neurons and their central axons that form the auditory nerve, as in virtually all deafness etiologies in humans, (Hawkins et al, 1977;Johnson et al, 1981;Nadol, 1981;Otte et al, 1978;Ylikoski, 1974). Initial SG cell degeneration is evident by 2-3 weeks postnatal (Leake et al, 1997) and is progressive and continues for many months to years (Leake and Hradek,'88).…”
Section: Data From Animal Models Suggest Two Phases In Spiral Gangliomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these animals have no normal auditory experience and model congenital bilateral profound hearing loss. Hair cell degeneration in these animals leads to subsequent degeneration of the primary afferent cochlear spiral ganglion (SG) neurons and their central axons that form the auditory nerve, as in virtually all deafness etiologies in humans, (Hawkins et al, 1977;Johnson et al, 1981;Nadol, 1981;Otte et al, 1978;Ylikoski, 1974). Initial SG cell degeneration is evident by 2-3 weeks postnatal (Leake et al, 1997) and is progressive and continues for many months to years (Leake and Hradek,'88).…”
Section: Data From Animal Models Suggest Two Phases In Spiral Gangliomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the larger numbers of channels available with the latest CI technology (e.g., Bvirtual channels^) may allow more flexibility in the frequency ranges delivered to different cochlear regions, further improvement of CI performance may depend on optimizing the tonotopic mapping of individual channels relative to the actual position of stimulation sites in the cochlea. A number of recent studies have been directed toward providing a better understanding of the role of electrode location and spacing on various perceptual attributes of hearing with a CI (Blamey et al 1996;Ketten et al 1998;Pfingst et al 2001;Skinner et al 2002;Yukawa et al 2004;Baumann and Nobbe 2006;Boex et al 2006). Several psychophysical studies have shown that spectral distortions such as apical or basal shift (Dorman et al 1997;Fu and Shannon 1999), nonlinear warping (Shannon et al 1998), and compression or expansion of the applied frequency map Shannon 2003, 2004) decrease speech perception, thus suggesting that an optimum fit of the frequency map for a given electrode position may significantly improve the performance of the CI listener.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially important consideration is that Greenwood_s equation may provide an accurate estimate of frequency for CI electrodes only if the site of spike initiation in electrical excitation of the spiral ganglion (SG) neurons is near the OC, i.e., at the first node of Ranvier on the radial nerve fibers. However, radial nerve fibers begin to degenerate soon after the OC is damaged (Otte et al 1978;Hinojosa et al 1983; Leake and Hradek 1988;Nadol et al 1989;Nadol 1990;McFadden et al 2004). In contrast, SG cell somata degenerate relatively slowly in humans, and significant populations often survive even after decades of deafness, and/or after many years of CI use, even when radial nerve fibers are largely absent (Fayad et al 1991;Nadol 1997;Khan et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open-set speech recognition is a key indicator of clinical success for humans who have received cochlear implants. Variables that influence implant outcomes include duration of deafness, cause of deafness, and ganglion cell survival (Otte et al 1978;Nadol et al 1989;Moore et al 1997;Linthicum and Fayad 2009). Other possible peripheral variables that are more difficult to assess are degree of auditory nerve fiber myelination, peripheral process survival, proximity of electrodes to primary neurons, amount of scar tissue resulting from surgical trauma and implantation, and blood supply to primary neurons.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the exact contribution of the total number of spiral ganglion cells to auditory performance remains unclear (Otte et al 1978;Fayad and Linthicum 2006). In light of the fact that more than 120,000 individuals worldwide have received cochlear implants for the treatment of profound sensorineural hearing impairment (Wilson and Dorman 2008), clarification of the relationship between electrical stimulation of the cochlea and spiral ganglion cell viability is of paramount significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%