2018
DOI: 10.1111/den.13242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage replacement of percutaneous drainage: A multicenter retrospective study

Abstract: Where ongoing gallbladder drainage is required, conversion from PTGBD to EUS-GBD is a feasible, effective, and safe technique for patients who cannot undergo cholecystectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no early adverse events. However, two patients required repeat interventions[37]. Larger studies are lacking at this time to accurately predict the risks and benefits of replacing percutaneous cholecystostomy with EUS guided LAMS drainage.…”
Section: Eus-guided Gallbladder Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no early adverse events. However, two patients required repeat interventions[37]. Larger studies are lacking at this time to accurately predict the risks and benefits of replacing percutaneous cholecystostomy with EUS guided LAMS drainage.…”
Section: Eus-guided Gallbladder Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with percutaneous tubes who need long-term GB drainage can also be converted to complete internal drainage using transmural EUS approach. 66 In this approach, the GB is infused with saline to result in distension. Percutaneous tubes can be safely removed after the EUS-guided internal drainage.…”
Section: Eus-guided Gall Bladder Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coiling of a guidewire within the gallbladder (GB), fistula dilation, and eventual proper positioning of a stent are essential prerequisites for successful EUS-GBD [5]. Technical failures of EUS-GBD made by beginners are often attributed to failure of over-the-wire insertion of a fistula-dilating device or stent delivery system into the GB [1, 6, 7], or stent misplacement in the final technical step [3, 8, 9]. Although most previous trials have reported technical failures of EUS-GBD with numerical data, few studies have reported details about technical failure and countermeasures for dealing with difficult situations in which technical failure is imminent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%