2023
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1133390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in patients with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or multiple sclerosis: An observational longitudinal study

Abstract: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is the treatment of choice for focal spasticity, with a concomitant effect on pain reduction and improvement of quality of life (QoL). Current evidence of its efficacy is based mainly on post stroke spasticity. This study aims to clarify the role of BoNT-A in the context of non-stroke spasticity (NSS). We enrolled 86 patients affected by multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury with clinical indication to perform BoNT-A treatment. Subjects were evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the evidence from these studies suggests that BoNT-A is a viable and effective treatment option for non-stroke spasticity in conditions such as multiple sclerosis, SCI, and traumatic brain injury. Its ability to improve functional outcomes, pain management, and quality of life, coupled with a favorable safety profile, emphasizes its utility in clinical practice [ 105 ]. However, ongoing research, including randomized clinical trials, remains crucial to further establish the efficacy of, and optimize treatment protocols for, BoNT-A in managing non-stroke spasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, the evidence from these studies suggests that BoNT-A is a viable and effective treatment option for non-stroke spasticity in conditions such as multiple sclerosis, SCI, and traumatic brain injury. Its ability to improve functional outcomes, pain management, and quality of life, coupled with a favorable safety profile, emphasizes its utility in clinical practice [ 105 ]. However, ongoing research, including randomized clinical trials, remains crucial to further establish the efficacy of, and optimize treatment protocols for, BoNT-A in managing non-stroke spasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain intensity, considered as the primary endpoint, was determined using a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum imaginable pain) [32,33]. The patient reported the pain experienced during previous injections without VR before injection and the pain experienced in the current procedure with VR after the end of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BoNT injections have been proven to be an effective intervention to treat focal spasticity in Stroke, Cerebral Palsy and Multiple Sclerosis. [12][13][14] In SCI, BoNT has found a consolidated indication in neurogenic detrusor overactivity treatment 15 , while its use for spasticity is currently an evolving field of research and clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, the most recent systematic review 16 aimed to assess the efficacy of BoNT chemodenervation, phenol and alcohol neurolysis in people affected by spasticity following SCI dates back to 2015 and has shown the lack of high-quality evidence, advocating for further research in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%