2016
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2016.1242773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical efficacy of laninamivir and peramivir in patients with seasonal influenza: a randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peramivir is a viable treatment option, especially in those patients in whom oral or inhaled antivirals are not the optimal route. 111,112 The pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza strain was also notable for an increased frequency of NAI resistance in up to 14% of strains. 113 However, NAI resistance is currently uncommon, with an overall incidence of 0.5% to 1.9% of isolates, but does remain an area of growing concern.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peramivir is a viable treatment option, especially in those patients in whom oral or inhaled antivirals are not the optimal route. 111,112 The pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza strain was also notable for an increased frequency of NAI resistance in up to 14% of strains. 113 However, NAI resistance is currently uncommon, with an overall incidence of 0.5% to 1.9% of isolates, but does remain an area of growing concern.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After literature search (Figure 1), we identified 14 studies that were potentially eligible for our metaanalysis [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. One study that evaluated the efficacy of laninamivir octanoate on a treatment setting was removed because the time to event was not precisely evaluated [30].…”
Section: Analysed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, high heterogeneity was observed in time to alleviation of all symptoms in our meta-analysis; thus, we performed sensitivity analysis. The heterogeneity significantly reduced after excluding two studies [26,31], and the result still favored the efficacy of peramivir. Yoshino applied ≤37 • C as the threshold of fever resolution; however, most studies used thresholds ranging from ≤37.5 • C to ≤38 • C. Clarifying this difference might be difficult because our included studies did not report the method of measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…All articles compared peramivir with at least one NAI. Five trials [21][22][23][24][25] compared peramivir with oseltamivir only, two trials [26,27] compared peramivir with oseltamivir and laninamivir, and five trials [28][29][30][31][32] compared peramivir with oseltamivir, laninamivir, and zanamivir. The risk of bias in most studies was low (Tables 1 and 2) and the quality of most outcomes was moderate ( Table 3).…”
Section: Study Search Outcomes and Included Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation