Clinical efficacy of transcrestal sinus floor augmentation, in comparison with lateral approach, in sites with residual bone height ≤6 mm: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Shi, Shaojie; Han, Luyao; Su, Jun; Guo, Jianmei; Yu, Fan; Zhang, Wenyun

doi:10.1111/clr.14155

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 63 publications

(339 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several surgical techniques have been presented to assess the sinus cavity, elevate the sinus membrane, and place bone grafts [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. In the lateral window sinus lift approach [ 6 ], a window is created through the buccal plate of the maxilla; the sinus membrane is carefully lifted, and autogenous bone (or bone substitute) is placed into the built space.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additive Manufacturing Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Sinuses Grafted with 70HA:30-TCP: A One-Year Retrospective Study for Evaluation of Survival Rate

Mafra,

Bordin,

Siroma

et al. 2024

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present short-term retrospective study evaluated the implant survival rate and peri-implant bone loss around additive-manufactured titanium implants placed in sinuses grafted with Plenum Osshp (Plenum Bioengenharia, Jundia, SP, Brazil) (70HA:30β-TCP) material. A total of 39 implants were inserted after 23 sinus floor elevation procedures in 16 consecutive patients. Prosthetic rehabilitation included fixed partial prostheses (three units), single crowns (eleven units), and fixed full arches (three units). Clinical and radiographic parameters of implant-supported restorations were evaluated after at least one year of occlusal loading. The implant–crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility, an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact (DIB) < 1.0 mm from the initial surgery, and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface. The overall cumulative implant survival rate was 97.43%. No prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface were reported. After one year, the mean DIB was 0.23 mm ± 0.14. Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that 70 HA:30 β-TCP allowed stable and reliable bone support to maintain healthy conditions around titanium dental implants produced by additive manufacturing.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additive Manufacturing Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Sinuses Grafted with 70HA:30-TCP: A One-Year Retrospective Study for Evaluation of Survival Rate

Mafra,

Bordin,

Siroma

et al. 2024

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years

Decker,

Stuhr,

Testori

et al. 2024

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionMaxillary sinus floor elevation is a surgical procedure intended to increase the volume of the bone vertically to accommodate dental implant placement. This intervention is frequently required for implant installation in the posterior maxilla, where the bone may be insufficient for securing implants of necessary length and stability. Sinus floor elevation can be completed either through a direct approach with a “window” through the lateral wall of the alveolar ridge or an indirect “transcrestal/transalveolar” sinus floor elevation (TSFE), which accesses the sinus floor through the crest of the edentulous ridge. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive scoping review of research conducted over the past 25 years on TSFE, specifically.MethodsA literature search aimed at identifying pertinent literature for the purpose of this PRISMA‐ScR‐compliant scoping review was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials, non‐randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series that met the eligibility criteria were selected. Relevant data from these studies were extracted. Primary outcome measures included radiographic bone levels and implant failure >5 years. Secondary outcome measures included implant stability at time of placement and complications. Interventions reported in the selected studies were grouped based on treatment modality, which were then compared with the control therapy (traditional osteotome technique) after a minimum of 12 months healing period.ResultsOur search yielded 633 records, and after deduplication, 574 of these were screened. Application of the eligibility criteria led to the inclusion of 37 articles in the final selection. Case selection for included studies enrolling subjects: Four different transcrestal sinus elevation treatment modalities were identified: (a) osteotome, (b) piezoelectric surgery, (c) osseodensification, and (d) hydraulic techniques. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no superior approach for TSFE could be identified. Overall, all techniques demonstrated high implant survival rates.ConclusionComprehensive understanding of the patient's medical history, available armamentarium, and post‐operative complications/management strategies are all essential to the completion of a successful TSFE approach for implant placement in the posterior maxilla, regardless of the treatment modality used.

show abstract

Radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation at sites without perforations and sites with perforations managed with a resorbable membrane: A retrospective study

Wang,

et al. 2024

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo evaluate the radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement at sites without sinus membrane perforation (SMP) and sites with SMP managed with a resorbable membrane.Materials and MethodsOne hundred and thirty‐nine patients and 170 implants (56 perforation, 114 non‐perforation) were included. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1) and 6 months after surgery (T2). Post‐operative augmentation parameters, including endo‐sinus bone gain (ESBG) along the implant axis, mean new bone height (NBH) surrounding the implant and augmentation volume (AV), were measured at T1 and T2.ResultsAt T1, there were no significant differences in ESBG, NBH and AV between the two groups. At T2, although ESBG did not significantly differ between the two groups, NBH (8.50 ± 1.99 mm vs. 9.99 ± 2.52 mm, p = .039) and AV (519.37 ± 258.38 mm3 vs. 700.99 ± 346.53 mm3, p < .001) were significantly lower in the perforation group. The shrinkage of graft material from T1 to T2, including ΔESBG (p = .002), ΔNBH (p < .001) and ΔAV (p < .001), was higher in the perforation group.ConclusionsSMP during LSFE with simultaneous implant placement is associated with greater resorption of the grafted area at a 6‐month follow‐up.

show abstract

Clinical efficacy of transcrestal sinus floor augmentation, in comparison with lateral approach, in sites with residual bone height ≤6 mm: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 63 publications

Additive Manufacturing Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Sinuses Grafted with 70HA:30-TCP: A One-Year Retrospective Study for Evaluation of Survival Rate

Additive Manufacturing Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Sinuses Grafted with 70HA:30-TCP: A One-Year Retrospective Study for Evaluation of Survival Rate

Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years

Radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation at sites without perforations and sites with perforations managed with a resorbable membrane: A retrospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About