2018
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.4719/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT

Abstract: there is a good correlation between the findings identified by PET-CT and the endoscopic study. In our study, a SUVmax > 11 g/ml suggests a malignant pathology, which aids the prioritization of an endoscopic study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several patients presented with more than one lesion during colonoscopy. Every attempt was made to explore findings at the PET with the localization at colonoscopy, which is also described in the literature [30]. We did not explore the association of the anatomical location of the PET-avid lesions with individual findings on colonoscopy and the final pathological reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several patients presented with more than one lesion during colonoscopy. Every attempt was made to explore findings at the PET with the localization at colonoscopy, which is also described in the literature [30]. We did not explore the association of the anatomical location of the PET-avid lesions with individual findings on colonoscopy and the final pathological reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gutman et al reported that 15 of 20 patients with focal colonic FDG uptake had positive endoscopic findings. 10 van Hoeij et al, 11 Treglia et al, 7 Garrido Durán et al 12 and Putora et al 13 reported a PPV of 62% to 86%. In view of the high likelihood of identifying a polypoid lesion, our study supports previous suggestions of performing endoscopy for further investigations of incidental focal colonic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidental FDG uptake was found in 3.6% of patients in PET/CT evaluations for non-GI system diseases 8 . However, false positive involvements were detected in 9.3–63% of patients, emphasizing the need to interpret PET/CT results 9 carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%