Objective:To describe the observed behavior of professionals in two neonatal and pediatric intensive care units regarding the use of central venous catheter insertion bundle, and the clinical and birth profile of neonates and children who received the devices. Method: A quantitative descriptive exploratory study was conducted in two intensive care units of a public hospital in Belo Horizonte with neonates and children, between February and September 2016. Results: The sample consisted of 59 observed implants of central venous catheter. Most patients were male preterm infants, of cesarean delivery and proper weight according to the gestational age. Among all procedures observed, only three followed all recommendations for the central venous catheter insertion bundle. Incorrect techniques were observed while performing surgical antisepsis and inadequate use of chlorhexidine, an antiseptic. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of more investment in continuous training of the team on the prevention of bloodstream infection caused by central venous catheter to reduce the number of adverse events related to intravenous therapy.
DESCRIPTORS
INTRODUCTIONThe technical and scientific advances related to invasive procedures have led to reduced infant mortality and increased survival rate of preterm newborns, which has changed the profile of care, raising the demand for increasingly complex care required for the survival of this population (1)(2)(3) . The adoption of central venous catheters (CVC) in clinical practice was an important advance in the care to preterm newborns, ensuring safe venous access with less invasive, simple and low-cost techniques.The types of CVC commonly used in pediatrics and neonatology are peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), central insertion catheters, and umbilical venous catheters (UVC). These devices allow continuous administration of intravenous fluids and medications, parenteral nutrition, hemodynamic monitoring, and in some cases transfusion of blood products, depending on the catheter caliber and the patient's age (2,4) . Despite the advantages of CVC, there are risks of complications associated with their use, such as venous thromboembolism, hemorrhage, infiltration, rupture, phlebitis and infection, with primary bloodstream infections (PBSI) being the most frequently related to health care (5)(6)(7) . PBSI can lead to clinical complications for patients, longer hospital stay, increased morbidity and mortality, and a significant increase in health care costs (8) . Planning and adopting PBSI prevention measures is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality rates, improving the quality and safety of health care, and reducing hospitalization costs (7,(9)(10) . Strategies have been developed to reduce the incidence of PBSI associated with central venous catheters, for instance, the guidelines proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), called Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections (10) . This is a...