Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and pain intensity of and patient's satisfaction with non-opioid analgesics while evaluating postoperative piritramide consumption for providing pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy. Design: This was a randomized, double-blinded study. Materials and Methods: With the patient under general anesthesia, surgery was performed on 120 women using propofol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxant. Four patient groups (n = 30 each) were treated over 24 hours with normal saline (NaCl), parecoxib, metamizol, or paracetamol in addition to piritramide using the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Postoperatively, patients were asked every 2 hours for the first 6 hours, and afterwards once every 6 hours, to quantify their pain experience at rest on different pain scales, including patient satisfaction. Cumulative piritramide consumption within 24 hours postoperatively was recorded on the display of the PCA pump. Results: The first required amounts of piritramide in the recovery room were similarly high in all groups and the incremental piritramide consumptions after 6, 12 and 24 hours showed no significant difference among the four groups. Also, with cumulative PCA-piritramide consumption no significant difference could be found. In all groups, the highest level of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was registered upon arrival in the recovery room. However, there was a significant difference only at 6 hours after surgery between the NaCl group and the paracetamol and parecoxib groups. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in regard to opioid-sparing effect by administering additional non-opioids, whereas VAS scores were significantly lower in the paracetamol and parecoxib groups at 6 hours after surgery. Any further benefits were marginal and statistically not significant. ( J GYNECOL SURG 28:101)