2016
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhw012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Ethics Consultants are not “Ethics” Experts—But They do Have Expertise

Abstract: (1988, 8).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal of Medical Ethics Clinical ethics consultation Theoretical paper To describe experiences from the University Hospital of Freiburg regarding the provision of clinical ethics support Ethics consultation developed as a consequence of increased ethical awareness, expansion of medical interventions, influence of legal aspects, economic constraints, patients dying in hospital and experiences of ethical conflict related to treatment at the end of life. Rasmussen ( 2016 ). Clinical Ethics consultants are not “ethics” experts-but they do have expertise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Medical Ethics Clinical ethics consultation Theoretical paper To describe experiences from the University Hospital of Freiburg regarding the provision of clinical ethics support Ethics consultation developed as a consequence of increased ethical awareness, expansion of medical interventions, influence of legal aspects, economic constraints, patients dying in hospital and experiences of ethical conflict related to treatment at the end of life. Rasmussen ( 2016 ). Clinical Ethics consultants are not “ethics” experts-but they do have expertise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while the competencies listed in Table represent an emerging consensus for skills required for clinical ethics consultation, there is no normative consensus on what constitutes ethics ‘expertise’. There is important normative work defining clinical ethics expertise emerging, which clinical ethics professional bodies need to engage with in order to develop professional standards that truly reflect the required expertise. A recent special edition of Bioethics identified the need for research that integrates both empirical and normative elements, and there is exciting research of this nature emerging – for example, Jellema, Mackor and Molewijk's study developing a coding scheme for assessing quality in deliberation and Schildmann et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One drawback of relying on an ethics coordinator involves what it means to be an 'ethics expert' and how the ethics coordinator is appointed by an organization. The skillset required to be considered an 'ethics expert' has historically been ambiguously defined and an ongoing debate centers around whether ethics expertise can exist in healthcare settings (e.g., Brummett & Ostertag, 2018;Ho, 2016;Iltis & Rasmussen, 2016;McClimans & Slowther, 2016;Rasmussen, 2016;Rhodes, 2019). Restated as questions, how do we know someone is qualified to be the ethics coordinator?…”
Section: Systems To Aid Ethical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups of people can also be more likely to effectively problem solve solutions to workplace challenges when the right contingencies exist around cooperative and creative behavior (e.g., Benbunan-Fich & Hiltz, 1999;Heller, Keith, & Anderson, 1992;Mumford, Feldman, Hein, & Nagao, 2001). Contingencies surrounding contact with the literature, collaboration, and creative problem-solving with ethics-related activities and decision-making may be especially helpful when ethics committee members lack formal training or background in applied ethics (Swetz, Hook, Hellyer, & Mueller, 2013;Rasmussen, 2016).…”
Section: Systems To Aid Ethical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%