2020
DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of a High-fidelity Upper Arm Cuff to Measure Arterial Blood Pressure during Noncardiac Surgery

Abstract: Background In most patients having noncardiac surgery, blood pressure is measured with the oscillometric upper arm cuff method. Although the method is noninvasive and practical, it is known to overestimate intraarterial pressure in hypotension and to underestimate it in hypertension. A high-fidelity upper arm cuff incorporating a hydraulic sensor pad was recently developed. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether noninvasive blood pressure measurements with the new high-fideli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thank Dr. Dueck 1 for his thoughtful reading of our article. 2 Dr. Dueck’s first comment was also made by Saugel et al in the accompanying editorial to our article. 3 Therefore, we take the opportunity to comment on the issues raised and to discuss our statistical approach as detailed in the supplements.…”
Section: In Replysupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We thank Dr. Dueck 1 for his thoughtful reading of our article. 2 Dr. Dueck’s first comment was also made by Saugel et al in the accompanying editorial to our article. 3 Therefore, we take the opportunity to comment on the issues raised and to discuss our statistical approach as detailed in the supplements.…”
Section: In Replysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…3 Therefore, we take the opportunity to comment on the issues raised and to discuss our statistical approach as detailed in the supplements. 2…”
Section: In Replymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 In pilot randomized trials, continuous noninvasive finger cuff blood pressure monitoring reduced intraoperative hypotension compared to intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring. 24,42 Other blood pressure monitoring methods-such as the hydraulic coupling method, 43 applanation tonometry, 44 the pulse wave transit time method, 45 or the pulse decomposition method 46 -may prove to be important alternatives to conventional perioperative blood pressure monitoring methods, but all have inherent technical limitations and need meticulous validation before being broadly adopted in routine care. 47,48 Anesthesia professionals routinely evaluate blood pressure changes and try to predict when patients will become hypotensive.…”
Section: Blood Pressure Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have compared non-invasive BP measurement with a nger-cuff to direct BP measurement with an invasive arterial catheter in a variety of patients, without an explicit focus on patients after valve replacement surgery [20][21][22][23]. Those studies have shown that the measurement accuracy of the nger-cuff method is reduced in hypertensive patients and the elderly because peripheral small arteries such as the ngertips may be occluded or stenotic secondary to the effect of hypertension [7,24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%