1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01616744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of a method for automatic detection and removal of artifacts in auditory evoked potential monitoring

Abstract: We conclude that the described method of automatic detection and removal of artifacts in AEP recordings effectively improves the quality of the resulting AEP waveform, without excessive rejection of artifact-free signal periods. The signal variables used in this method seem appropriate for distinguishing artifact-free signal periods from periods containing artifacts for the types of artifact that were studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual inspection of the data was then performed using topographical maps and synoptic plots, but no further channels or segments were removed. The mean percentage of trials retained for AEP averaging was at least 80% of total segments for each group (HC: 82.11 ± 14.65%; MDD: 85.38 ± 16.80%), consistent with prior studies (23, 24). Finally, data from the 185 channels were re-referenced using linked mastoids and baseline corrected by subtracting the average voltage during the 100 msec preceding the tone.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Visual inspection of the data was then performed using topographical maps and synoptic plots, but no further channels or segments were removed. The mean percentage of trials retained for AEP averaging was at least 80% of total segments for each group (HC: 82.11 ± 14.65%; MDD: 85.38 ± 16.80%), consistent with prior studies (23, 24). Finally, data from the 185 channels were re-referenced using linked mastoids and baseline corrected by subtracting the average voltage during the 100 msec preceding the tone.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The traditional approach to remove the eye blinks is to use the linear filters for certain frequency bands that belong to artifact range [73]. This however leads to significant loss of neurological activity, as there is always spectral overlap between neurological and artifactual phenomenon [74]. Another common practice for correcting the ocular artifacts (OA) is by using regression analysis [75].…”
Section: Processing Of Brain Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary benefit is that additional physiological information in the form of EOG or EMG signals are not necessary to remove the artefacts. However, linear filtering fails when the neurological phenomenon of interest and artefact lie in similar frequency bands (de Beer et al, 1995). A look at the frequency ranges of neurological phenomena used in neonatal (0-32 Hz) and epileptic (0-64 Hz) EEG shows that for ocular (0-16 Hz) , muscle (10-100 Hz), cardiac (1-3 Hz) and respiration (0-12 Hz) artefacts this is usually the case (Volpe, 2008;Rowan and Tolunsky, 2003;Cacioppo et al, 2007).…”
Section: Filtering and Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%