Clinical Evaluation of Acellular Allograft Dermis for the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession

Abstract

These results suggest that acellular allogeneic dermal matrix may be a useful substitute for autogenous connective tissue grafts in root coverage procedures.

Root Coverage with an Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft [Alloderm® ] – A Case Report

“…In this report, recession depth decreased from baseline to 8th week and 16thweek which is significant and correlates well with the results obtained by Harris [2002] [7], Henderson et al [1999] [10] and Arthur BNovaes et al [1999] [3].The recession width decreased at the end of 8th week and 16th week, which is significant and is consistent with the study done by AichelmannReidy et al [2001] [1].…”

“…In this case report, there is an increase in width of keratinized gingiva from baseline to 8th week and after 16th week, which correlates well with the study done by AichelmannReidy et al [2001] [1]. This significant gain in the width of keratinized tissue is worth noting.It is commonly thought that a connective tissue graft would contribute to keratinization of the overlying epithelium.…”

Management of a complex dentoalveolar trauma: a case report

“…The loss of marginal bone support is common in cases of alveolar bone wall fracture (1), the use of an acellular dermal matrix has been considered as one of the best treatments for root coverage, reduction of recession, and gain of clinical attachment (17,18). In the present case, the labial alveolar bone was lost and a periodontal surgery with Alloderm resulted in a greater formation of keratinous tissue and an esthetically acceptable gingival contour.…”

Aplicación de biomateriales de base biológica, moléculas bioactivas e ingeniería de tejidos en cirugía plástica periodontal: Una revisión

“…Algunos estudios clínicos randomizados (12,13) han comparado la MDA con el ITCS para el tratamiento de la recesión gingival tipo I-II de Miller ≥2 mm. Después de 6 meses de observación, concluyeron no encontrar diferencias significativas entre el grupo test (MDA) y el grupo control (ITCS), en términos de recubrimiento radicular, avalando así el uso de la MDA como un sustituto para el ITCS.…”