2002
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
79
1
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
79
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested that reinforcement at the cervical third of the pontic region (area of tension under the occlusal load) showed higher fracture toughness values. 12,13 This was not in agreement with the results obtained in this study. This can be explained because interim restoration resin, like most brittle materials, has a greater compressive than tensile strength.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…It is suggested that reinforcement at the cervical third of the pontic region (area of tension under the occlusal load) showed higher fracture toughness values. 12,13 This was not in agreement with the results obtained in this study. This can be explained because interim restoration resin, like most brittle materials, has a greater compressive than tensile strength.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The results of this study exhibited a mean fracture strength higher that 1,700 N. Results that could position these types of prostheses as suitable and strong enough to be used in clinical applications. That suitability has been previously noted 7,[32][33][34] , where successful applications of FRC restorations in clinical dentistry was reported. In addition, various studies have shown improved aspects of FRCs such as flexural and fatigue properties, framework design, and load-bearing capacities 14,35) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…17 Clinical studies showed that FRC bridges can be used successfully in a period of 5 to 10 years. [18][19][20][21] Also sensitivity in the construction phase of restoration directly affects the life of the restoration. It is indicated for patients who rejecting comprehensive treatment on financial grounds and has difficulty to tolerate prolonged therapy procedures.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%