2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of laboratory-made and CAD-CAM—fabricated occlusal devices to treat oral parafunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the different fabrication methods, to make the ODs comparable some standardized fabrication guidelines were established. The common guidelines were: devices were located on the maxillary dentition, all maxillary teeth were covered, minimum 1.5 mm interocclusal thickness between the posteriors (first molars), 1 mm of buccal extension below from the survey line flat, smooth occlusal contact, surfaces balanced, simultaneous static occlusion between the occlusal device and all the buccal cusps of the mandibular teeth, posterior disocclusion during lateral and protrusive movements, condylar inclination of 25°, immediate side shift of 2 mm, progressive side shift of 10° were selected as standard parameters 17,18,22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the different fabrication methods, to make the ODs comparable some standardized fabrication guidelines were established. The common guidelines were: devices were located on the maxillary dentition, all maxillary teeth were covered, minimum 1.5 mm interocclusal thickness between the posteriors (first molars), 1 mm of buccal extension below from the survey line flat, smooth occlusal contact, surfaces balanced, simultaneous static occlusion between the occlusal device and all the buccal cusps of the mandibular teeth, posterior disocclusion during lateral and protrusive movements, condylar inclination of 25°, immediate side shift of 2 mm, progressive side shift of 10° were selected as standard parameters 17,18,22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were selected as standard parameters. 17,18,22 The silicone impressions were poured 30 min after acquisition with dental stone type IV (Fugi Rock; GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium)…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Próteses totais e parciais removíveis possuem aplicações bem sucedidas através de técnicas digitais para impressão, registro virtual da relação maxilomandibular, desenho e confecção das bases da prótese e arranjo de dentes artificiais (INFANTE et al, 2014;RUSSO;SALAMINI, 2018;NISHIYAMA et al, 2020). Por fim, dispositivos oclusais confeccionados por sistema CAD/CAM para o tratamento do bruxismo proporcionam menos etapas clínicas de produção e podem ofertar maior conforto (LAUREN;MCINTYRE, 2008;BRANDT et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified