Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations

Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo; Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves; Tapety, Celiane Mary Carneiro; Bresciani, Eduardo; Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima

doi:10.1590/s1678-77572005000100004

Cited by 24 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The present 3-year results of multiplesurface ART restorations are very encouraging and confirm a promising performance of the ART restorations observed after 6 months and 1 year by Cefaly et al [16,17]. Regarding to cavity type, 100% of Class I restorations were considered successful for Fuji VIII and 86.7% for Ketac Molar.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…The clinical criteria used to assess the quality of restorations in the present study (Table 2) were similar to those used in other ART studies [16,17,19]. These criteria are appropriate for clinical evaluations carried out in a field setting and are defined by a description of the reason for success or failures of the restorations [4,8,16,17,19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The ball of the CPI probe (0.5 mm in diameter) was used to measure the size of any marginal defect and the amount of wear. Restorations with codes 0,1 and 2 were regarded as successful, codes 3 to 6 were regarded as failures and cases with codes 7 and 8 were excluded from the analysis (Table 2) [16,17]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These criteria are appropriate for clinical evaluations carried out in a field setting and are defined by a description of the reason for success or failures of the restorations [4,8,16,17,19]. In this study, similarly as others reporting ART restoration replacement by another treatment, these scenarios were classified as failure [12,16,17,20].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More recently, the RM GIC restorative, Fuji VIII (GC) was marketed for the ART; this GIC is chemically cured [16,17].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up

Cefaly¹,

Barata

Bresciani

et al. 2013

BDS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Avaliar o comportamento clínico de restaurações de superfícies múltiplas, realizadas com dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro (CIVs) em dentes permanentes, utilizandose o Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART). Material e Métodos: 60 restaurações foram realizadas em escolares (idade entre 9 -16 anos) por dois dentistas utilizando-se os procedimentos convencionais do AR. As restaurações foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Trinta cavidades foram restauradas com CIV de alta viscosidade (Ketac Molar -3M ESPE) e 30, com CIV modificado por resina (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Dois avaliadores calibrados e independentes realizaram a avaliação segundo os critérios do ART. Os resultados foram submetidos à análise estatística utilizando-se modelos de regressão logística múltipla, avaliando-se o sucesso em função das variáveis associadas (CIV, operador e tipo de cavidade). Intervalos de confiança de 95% para o sucesso foram baseados na distribuição binomial. Diferenças estatisticamente significantes ocorreram se p < 0,05. Resultados: Em 3 anos de acompanhamento 57 restaurações foram avaliadas. No grupo do Ketac Molar, 3 restaurações não foram avaliadas, 21 obtiveram sucesso e 6 falharam. No grupo do Fuji VIII, 28 restaurações obtiveram sucesso e 2 falharam. A combinação de variáveis foi somente significante em relação à sobrevida das restaurações (p = 0,036). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos considerando-se cada variável independentemente. A combinação apresentando melhor desempenho foi: Fuji VIII, operador B e Classe I envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies dentárias. Conclusão: O desempenho clínico de restaurações de ART de superfícies múltiplas foi considerado satisfatório para ambos os materiais testados, apresentando altos índices de sucesso após três anos.Avaliação clínica de restaurações de ART de superfícies múltiplas: acompanhamento de três anos ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations made with two different glass-ionomer cements (GICs) in permanent teeth using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Material and methods: A total of 60 restorations were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two dentists using standard ART procedures. The restorations were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cavities were filled with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar-3M ESPE) and 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Two calibrated independent examiners carried out the evaluation according to ART criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using multiple logistic regression models to evaluate the variables associated with the success (GIC, operator, Class type). The 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for success were based on the binomial distribution. A difference was statistically significant if p < 0.05. Results: In a 3-year follow-up, 57 restorations were evaluated. In the Ketac Molar group, 3 restorations were not evaluated, 21 were considered successful and 6 unsuccessful. In the Fuji VIII group, 28 restorations were considere...

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More recently, the RM GIC restorative, Fuji VIII (GC) was marketed for the ART; this GIC is chemically cured [16,17].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up

Cefaly¹,

Barata

Bresciani

et al. 2013

BDS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Physicochemical Nature of Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and Their Clinical Performance

Burrow

2016

Glass-Ionomers in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91–94%) and 62% (CI, 51–73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77–91%) and 80% (CI, 76–83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59–98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. Clinical relevance: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.

show abstract

Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations

Cited by 24 publications

References 15 publications

Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up

Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up

Physicochemical Nature of Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and Their Clinical Performance

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About