1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01860.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Oral Methadone in Treatment of Cancer Pain

Abstract: A dose-adjustment program for oral methadone and the long-term effects of the analgesic therapy have been evaluated in 15 patients with incurable cancer. Rapid and continuous pain reliefwithout serious side-effects was achieved by "ad libitum" dosage in the first 3-5 days. Thereafter, a dosage based on each patient's subjective need was instituted. The mean daily dose was 44 mg during the first day and it decreased to 22 mg daily at the end of the dose-adjustment week. Three patients did not complete the progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, continuous treatment with these same doses of U50,488 did not decrease food-maintained responding more than cocaine-maintained responding when the two reinforcers were available separately in alternating sessions (Negus et al 1997). Fourth, it is well-established that mu opioid receptor agonists produce nausea and emesis in humans (Cepeda et al 2003;Hansen et al 1982), and, as with U50,488, pseudo-continuous infusion with the mu opioid receptor agonist methadone decreased response rates in rhesus monkeys choosing between food and cocaine; however, methadone did not alter cocaine choice in this procedure (Negus and Mello 2004). Finally, lithium chloride produces emesis in non-human primates (Verbalis et al 1987), but chronic treatment with lithium chloride did not increase choice of cocaine over food in rhesus monkeys, and some decreases in cocaine choice (and increases in food choice) were observed (Woolverton and Balster 1979).…”
Section: Effect Of U50488 Treatment On Choice Between Cocaine and Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, continuous treatment with these same doses of U50,488 did not decrease food-maintained responding more than cocaine-maintained responding when the two reinforcers were available separately in alternating sessions (Negus et al 1997). Fourth, it is well-established that mu opioid receptor agonists produce nausea and emesis in humans (Cepeda et al 2003;Hansen et al 1982), and, as with U50,488, pseudo-continuous infusion with the mu opioid receptor agonist methadone decreased response rates in rhesus monkeys choosing between food and cocaine; however, methadone did not alter cocaine choice in this procedure (Negus and Mello 2004). Finally, lithium chloride produces emesis in non-human primates (Verbalis et al 1987), but chronic treatment with lithium chloride did not increase choice of cocaine over food in rhesus monkeys, and some decreases in cocaine choice (and increases in food choice) were observed (Woolverton and Balster 1979).…”
Section: Effect Of U50488 Treatment On Choice Between Cocaine and Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an open study, 45 patients were treated with oral liquid preparation of methadone administered 2–3 times daily and followed up at home; methadone was well tolerated and did not cause serious adverse effects (119). In another open study, oral methadone proved to be effective and well tolerated in 12 of 15 patients who continued long‐term therapy without serious side effects; three patients withdrew because of nausea (2) and confusion (1) (120).…”
Section: Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16,18,19 A pain or palliative care consultation would be required for doses exceeding 20 mg daily, dosing schedules more frequent than every 8 hours, or any orders that did not meet the criteria set forth in the order form. Ask patients about adverse effects prior to increasing their methadone dose.…”
Section: Methadone Dosing Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%