1983
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Anesthesia using a Pressure Syringe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After a second intraligamentary injection, success rose to 92%. Smith et al (12) noted similar success (93%) for intraligamentary injections in patients in whom conventional (6) reported that there was no significant difference between IANB alone (63%) and IANB plus intraligamentary injection (78%) with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in mandibular first molars. Nusstein et al (7) noted that 56% of mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis that had failed anesthesia after IANB became anesthetized when 1.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered as an intraligamentary injection by using a computerized delivery system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…After a second intraligamentary injection, success rose to 92%. Smith et al (12) noted similar success (93%) for intraligamentary injections in patients in whom conventional (6) reported that there was no significant difference between IANB alone (63%) and IANB plus intraligamentary injection (78%) with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in mandibular first molars. Nusstein et al (7) noted that 56% of mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis that had failed anesthesia after IANB became anesthetized when 1.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered as an intraligamentary injection by using a computerized delivery system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Reinjection, if the first intraligamentary injection failed, was shown to be successful in 71% of the patients for an overall success rate of 92%. Smith et al (21) reported an 83% success rate for the supplemental intraligamentary injection in endodontic patients. Reinjection was required in 33% of the patients to achieve the 83% success rate.…”
Section: Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has limitations as a principal method of anaesthesia (such as variable duration) but has been used to overcome failed conventional methods. 9,10 The technique is equally effective with conventional or specialised syringes. Glass cartridges are used in this method as the plastic type deform under the pressures produced.…”
Section: Intraligamentary Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 12 mm 30 gauge is recommended although efficacy is independent of needle diameter. 9,10 Ideally the bevel should face the bone although effectiveness is not impaired with different orientations. 12 The needle does not penetrate deeply into the periodontal ligament but is wedged at the crest of the alveolar ridge.…”
Section: Intraligamentary Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%