1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90251-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials

Abstract: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author wishes to acknowledge the following people:The Junior and Senior dental students and staff who volunteered their time for this study.Doctor Timothy Hart for his willing assistance in the statistical analysis of this research.My husband, Doctor James Bruno, for his moral support.The members of my committee, Doctor William F.P. Malone, Doctor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evident in various topics such as in processing errors that are possible during registration, during laboratory work or by the shrinking properties within the material itself. [1][2][3][4][5]12,13 Additionally, only few investigations about the reproducibility and characteristics of the habitual occlusion itself have been done and in these cases using mounted plaster models. [14][15][16] A study about static occlusion for instance examined the precision of the intercuspation in articulated models with an electronic evaluation by a condymeter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is evident in various topics such as in processing errors that are possible during registration, during laboratory work or by the shrinking properties within the material itself. [1][2][3][4][5]12,13 Additionally, only few investigations about the reproducibility and characteristics of the habitual occlusion itself have been done and in these cases using mounted plaster models. [14][15][16] A study about static occlusion for instance examined the precision of the intercuspation in articulated models with an electronic evaluation by a condymeter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several examinations on their properties were the subject of previous investigations. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Yet, the accuracy of these materials remains questionable. This is evident in various topics such as in processing errors that are possible during registration, during laboratory work or by the shrinking properties within the material itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used material in daily clinical practice because of its ease of handling, clinical versatility and low cost (3,18). In this study, the combination of acrylic resin and wax presented the lowest mean value of vertical separation between casts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Despite its favorable properties, ZOE is a brittle material that strongly adheres to the dental surface due to contractions and, in the presence of excesses, it may suffer rupture and distortion and cause vertical displacement (9,17,18). In cases of edentulous areas, the ZOE paste in combination with the register base tends to dislocate the underlying mucosa, resulting in articulator mounting with a slight vertical opening (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Even if a registration is accurate there remains the problem of storage and easy retrieval. Alternative means of recording occlusions include photosensitive films and pressure sensitive wafers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%