1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.1998.00128.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of the branched DNA assay for hepatitis B virus DNA detection in patients with chronic hepatitis B lacking hepatitis B e antigen and treated with interferon‐α

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Chiron branched DNA (bDNA) assay for detection of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in patients with chronic hepatitis B lacking hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and undergoing interferon (IFN) therapy. Results obtained with the bDNA assay were compared with those obtained using the Abbott liquid hybridization (LH) assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serial samples (274) from 34 patients were analysed. Analysis of variance results indicated that bDNA values wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we observed a strong, significant relationship between HBV DNA levels obtained by the CAP/CTM v2.0 assay and those obtained by the third-generation bDNA-based assay. The use of the third-generation bDNA assay as a comparator was justified by the facts that this assay is accurate, precise, reproducible, and well calibrated to the World Health Organization HBV DNA standard and that it quantifies HBV DNA levels independently of the HBV genotype, due to the presence of a large number of capture and extender probes located at various positions along the HBV genome (7,11). There was also an excellent correspondence between versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the CAP/CTM assay in plasma in our experiments, regardless of the HBV genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we observed a strong, significant relationship between HBV DNA levels obtained by the CAP/CTM v2.0 assay and those obtained by the third-generation bDNA-based assay. The use of the third-generation bDNA assay as a comparator was justified by the facts that this assay is accurate, precise, reproducible, and well calibrated to the World Health Organization HBV DNA standard and that it quantifies HBV DNA levels independently of the HBV genotype, due to the presence of a large number of capture and extender probes located at various positions along the HBV genome (7,11). There was also an excellent correspondence between versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the CAP/CTM assay in plasma in our experiments, regardless of the HBV genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenesis of liver damage is immunemediated where the role of cytokines is crucial. Several studies have failed to show correlation between HBV DNA and serum aminotransferases, which is additional evidence that HBV DNA does not correlate with severity of liver disease [13][14] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous assays are available for detection of HBV DNA, such as the branched DNA (bDNA) assay (6,13), DNA hybridization assays (9,24), and quantitative PCR (1,12,22). Some of these assays have only limited sensitivity, however, and detection by PCR may be considered to be laborious and susceptible to contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%