2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of the Intraoperative Refraction Technique for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also shows how accurately astigmatic measurements by IWA predicted the result at 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, mean and median prediction errors and within target ratios for the three published aphakia formulae by Ianchulev,7 Leccisotti8 and Wong9 (computed with our dataset) as compared with our newly derived aberrometry-based formulae and with conventional biometry with the Haigis formula10 are described. The distribution of the prediction errors is illustrated in figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also shows how accurately astigmatic measurements by IWA predicted the result at 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, mean and median prediction errors and within target ratios for the three published aphakia formulae by Ianchulev,7 Leccisotti8 and Wong9 (computed with our dataset) as compared with our newly derived aberrometry-based formulae and with conventional biometry with the Haigis formula10 are described. The distribution of the prediction errors is illustrated in figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refractive outcome is reported in terms of the difference between the 3-month postoperative manifest SE and the planned refractive outcome (prediction error). Once adjustments for differing back vertex distances and A-constants had been made, the data of this study were inserted into the published aphakia formulae by Ianchulev,7 Leccisotti8 and Wong9 and the corresponding calculations were computed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Concerning intraoperative measurements, two different technologies were used for IOL power calculation recently: intraoperatively performed autorefraction showed to implicate several problems, such as alignment problems, because the patients couldn't see the fixation target and the use of OVDs made measurements impossible. 22 The second more recently introduced technology is intraoperatively measured wavefront aberrometry. However, this technology was found to be inaccurate for this purpose due to several problems, such as residual viscoelastics in the anterior chamber and tear film problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous devices and formulas are currently available, allowing accurate determination of the IOL power needed to reach the target refraction. [13,4**,5*,69,10*,1116, 17*18] In order to accomplish target refraction, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and corneal radii (K1and K2) need to be accurately measured. Moreover, proper choices of IOL power calculation formulas are important, as are the use of accurate IOL constants, depending on the type of IOL and post-operative IOL location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%