2017
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of the Measurement Performance of the Philips Health Watch: A Within-Person Comparative Study

Abstract: BackgroundPhysical inactivity is an important modifiable risk factor for chronic diseases. A new wrist-worn heart rate and activity monitor has been developed for unobtrusive data collection to aid prevention and management of lifestyle-related chronic diseases by means of behavioral change programs.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of total energy expenditure and resting heart rate measures of the Philips health watch. Secondary objectives included the assessment of accuracy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because effective prevention of eGWG is based on being sufficiently active throughout the entire day, the overall estimation error is the most relevant error to consider; additionally, the OHRM does accurately monitor energy expenditure during exercise activities. The overall underestimation is similar to the − 3% (and 10% MAPE) error reported by Hendrikx and colleagues [ 34 ] when they validated a medical class-2a activity monitor in the general population in a 48 min protocol. The high similarity of these observed errors highlights that the OHRM can be readily used in pregnant women as well as in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because effective prevention of eGWG is based on being sufficiently active throughout the entire day, the overall estimation error is the most relevant error to consider; additionally, the OHRM does accurately monitor energy expenditure during exercise activities. The overall underestimation is similar to the − 3% (and 10% MAPE) error reported by Hendrikx and colleagues [ 34 ] when they validated a medical class-2a activity monitor in the general population in a 48 min protocol. The high similarity of these observed errors highlights that the OHRM can be readily used in pregnant women as well as in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is a low speed for cycling that may have further reduced the already limited movement of the wrist and that may have resulted in an accelerometer contribution that is too low, thus resulting in underestimation of energy expenditure. An additional explanation is proposed by Hendrikx and colleagues [ 34 ] that also applies to our study due to (also) having been performed during winter time. Their explanation revolves around cold outside temperatures that result in (additional) vasoconstriction that, in turn, excessively reduces the amount of time in which the estimated heart rate is within a reasonable distance from the reference heart rate thus increasing the difference between reference and estimated energy expenditure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the authors of [14] validate the use of a commercial HR monitor, which employs PPG to track HR waveforms during rest. A similar conclusion is found in [15] with a smartwatch. This validation of PPG-based HR tracking has led to developments that seek to strengthen HR monitoring on environments where sensor signals can be corrupted by body movements [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Activity in this study was identified using daily heart rate profiles obtained by a wrist-worn device. Previous studies assessing the accuracy of such devices have found an overall high accuracy for measuring heart rate 22 , 23 as well as steps 24 26 , whereas different intensity levels 24 and energy expenditure 25 , 26 could only be determined imprecisely. The combined time spent in light/moderate activity correlates with daily steps (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%