2017
DOI: 10.1159/000479188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Urine Prostatic Exosomal Protein in the Diagnosis of Chronic Prostatitis

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical potential of urine prostatic exosomal protein (PSEP) as a diagnostic biomarker of chronic prostatitis (CP). Materials andmethods: Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, urine PSEP levels were detected in 103 control cases as well as 283 cases of CP, with 82 cases fulfilling the definition of the USA National Institutes of Health category II (NIH-II), 108 cases of NIH-IIIa and 93 cases of NIH-IIIb. The values of age, body mass index, prostate volume, serum prostatic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the results of this study, the levels of urinary PSEP were compared between groups. The comparison showed that the levels of PSEP detected in the subgroups of patients with CP were significantly higher than those in the control group, but did not seem to be able to identify CP subtypes for NIH classification, similar to the results of other researchers [31] . The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under NIH II, NIH IIIa, and NIH IIIb curves were 0.779, 0.77, and 0.745, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In the results of this study, the levels of urinary PSEP were compared between groups. The comparison showed that the levels of PSEP detected in the subgroups of patients with CP were significantly higher than those in the control group, but did not seem to be able to identify CP subtypes for NIH classification, similar to the results of other researchers [31] . The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under NIH II, NIH IIIa, and NIH IIIb curves were 0.779, 0.77, and 0.745, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the expression levels of PSEP in patients with NIH‐II, NIH‐IIIa, and NIH‐IIIb were not statistically different ( p > 0.0125). It can be seen that PSEP is not useful for identifying the NIH classification subtypes of CP, which is consistent with our previous report 11,12 . This may be because CP is caused by a variety of etiologies, including complex pathological changes such as immunity, pathogenicity, and neuroendocrine inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The sperm proteins that are expressed in greater abundance in high-compared with low-fertility bulls were found to be HSP90, ZFP34, IFNRF4, BCL62, NADHD, TUBB3 and histone H1 [24]. Enolase-1 (ENO1) was found to be overexpressed in the high-fertility and Binder of SPerm-1(BSP1) in the low-fertility group [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%