2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03741-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical factors influencing the performance of bacterial multiplex polymerase chain reaction in patients with community-onset pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among pneumonia cases, eight patients had bacteremia (7.3%) while 298 patients did not (46%). It may be that, with pneumonia, it is only possible to diagnose the causative pathogen in 30-40% of cases using conventional diagnostic methods (40). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PCT was superior to presepsin and CRP as a diagnostic biomarker, and it had higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting culture-proven bacterial infection and bacteremia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among pneumonia cases, eight patients had bacteremia (7.3%) while 298 patients did not (46%). It may be that, with pneumonia, it is only possible to diagnose the causative pathogen in 30-40% of cases using conventional diagnostic methods (40). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PCT was superior to presepsin and CRP as a diagnostic biomarker, and it had higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting culture-proven bacterial infection and bacteremia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among pneumonia cases, eight patients had bacteremia (7.3%) while 298 patients did not (46%). It may be that, with pneumonia, it is only possible to diagnose the causative pathogen in 30–40% of cases using conventional diagnostic methods ( 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex PCR has been widely used in a variety of fields of genetic testing and showed higher detection efficiency and lower cost compared to conventional PCR 15–17 . However, at least two shortcomings remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Multiplex PCR has been widely used in a variety of fields of genetic testing and showed higher detection efficiency and lower cost compared to conventional PCR. [15][16][17] However, at least two shortcomings remain. The first is poor consistency of amplification efficiency between different targets, 18 and the second is the false-positive/false-negative caused by primer-primer interactions and primer-amplicon interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%