2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based automatic head CBCT image segmentation and landmark detection in computer-aided surgical simulation for orthognathic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Liu et al (2021) introduced a coarse-to-fine 3D U-Net-based framework, named SkullEngine, which was designed for high-resolution segmentation and large-scale landmark detection in the skull. Deng et al (2023) studied 61 patients from the digital archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2021 and December 2021 and independently validated the segmentation accuracy of SkullEngine for teeth (Dice score for upper jaw teeth: 0.97; Dice score for lower jaw teeth: 0.96).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Liu et al (2021) introduced a coarse-to-fine 3D U-Net-based framework, named SkullEngine, which was designed for high-resolution segmentation and large-scale landmark detection in the skull. Deng et al (2023) studied 61 patients from the digital archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2021 and December 2021 and independently validated the segmentation accuracy of SkullEngine for teeth (Dice score for upper jaw teeth: 0.97; Dice score for lower jaw teeth: 0.96).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nnU-Net generates three U-Net configurations: a 2D U-Net, a full-resolution 3D U-Net, and a cascaded 3D U-Net ( Isensee et al, 2021 ). In comparison with those of Deng et al (2023) , the patients included in their study by Dot et al (2022) presented diverse anatomical deformities and had undergone orthognathic surgery. Dot et al (2022) demonstrated that nnU-Net performs well on CBCT images of such patients (Dice score for upper jaw teeth: 0.95; Dice score for lower jaw teeth: 0.94).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding 379 duplicates, 321 articles were selected for title and abstract review, resulting in 17 articles for full-text review ( Figure 1 ). Of the 17 articles, 4 studies were excluded, because their sample was less than 100 [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], and 5 studies were excluded, because their objectives did not include the facial diagnosis applied for orthognathic surgery using artificial intelligence, ultimately including 8 studies for descriptive and methodological analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, an article published in 2021 by Mascarehas et al reports on the cost-effective nature of in-house CASP and surgical splint printing for orthognathic surgery. Based on their analysis of 35 consecutive patients undergoing single jaw surgery, the total time needed from initial scanning to splint manufacturing took 5-9 h and with substantially reduced direct costs [64]. The authors remark, however, that the initial investment can be quite steep, as an institution would be required to purchase a high-power computer, intra-oral or model scanner, a 3D printer, and printing material.…”
Section: In-house Computer-assisted Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%