2019
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical features, microbiological epidemiology and recommendations for management of cellulitis in extremity lymphedema

Abstract: BackgroundThis high volume, single center study investigated the prevalence, bacterial epidemiology, and responsiveness to antibiotic therapy of cellulitis in extremity lymphedema.MethodsFrom 2003 to 2018, cellulitis events from a cohort of 420 patients with extremity lymphedema were reviewed. Demographics, lymphedema grading, symptoms, inflammatory markers, cultures and antibiotic therapy regimens were compiled from cellulitis episodes data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for detailed ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifetime prevalence is higher than previously reported (7Á95-35Á7%), with direct comparison challenging due to methodological differences. [17][18][19] Wounds, obesity, male sex, diabetes, midline swelling and, particularly, advanced stages of chronic oedema were independent risk factors for cellulitis, while control of swelling was associated with a lower risk. Although risk factors in cellulitis have been studied in a meta-analysis (identifying previous cellulitis, concurrent wounds, leg ulcers, excoriating skin diseases, tinea pedis, obesity and lymphoedema/chronic oedema as risk factors), 9 only one single-centre study has been specifically designed in patients with chronic oedema/lymphoedema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifetime prevalence is higher than previously reported (7Á95-35Á7%), with direct comparison challenging due to methodological differences. [17][18][19] Wounds, obesity, male sex, diabetes, midline swelling and, particularly, advanced stages of chronic oedema were independent risk factors for cellulitis, while control of swelling was associated with a lower risk. Although risk factors in cellulitis have been studied in a meta-analysis (identifying previous cellulitis, concurrent wounds, leg ulcers, excoriating skin diseases, tinea pedis, obesity and lymphoedema/chronic oedema as risk factors), 9 only one single-centre study has been specifically designed in patients with chronic oedema/lymphoedema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circumferential difference, which was calculated as the circumference of the lesioned limb decreasing the normal limb divided by the normal limb and multiplied by 100%, was used to evaluate the functional recovery of lymphedematous limbs. The episodes of cellulitis per year were compared between the two groups 34 . A Lymphedema Quality‐of‐Life (LYMQoL) questionnaire was administered preoperatively and 3 years postoperatively 35 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesquisa afirma que o linfedema compromete os sistemas de filtragem bacteriana e possibilita o acesso de bactérias no tecido mole à circulação sistêmica e que a especificação microbiológica, seja por hemocultura ou swab da lesão, é útil, quando positiva, para orientar a antibioticoterapia (16) .…”
Section: Discussão Diagnósticounclassified