2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30496-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical genomic profiling in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma

Abstract: There are more than 70 distinct sarcomas, and this diversity complicates the development of precision-based therapeutics for these cancers. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling could overcome this challenge by providing insight into sarcomas’ molecular drivers. Through targeted panel sequencing of 7494 sarcomas representing 44 histologies, we identify highly recurrent and type-specific alterations that aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions. Sequencing could lead to refinement or reassignment of 10.5%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
6
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, two members of the Fanconi anemia core complex, FANCA and FANCB,t h eTP53 regulator MDM2,t h e tumor suppressor PTEN, cell cycle checkpoint regulators RAD1 and CHEK1, DNA damage and replication proteins ATM, RPA1 and H2AFX completed the list of the 10 top altered HRR genes in the TCGA-SARC cohort. Our genomic analyses are in line with recently published work (Gounder et al, 2022;N a c e vet al, 2022)t h a t described molecular patterns and genomic instability signatures in distinct sarcoma histotypes using a large cohort of sarcoma patients. In contrast to their findings, we identified a significant number of gene alterations in an extended HRR gene set, thus contributing to elucidate potential molecular mechanisms for HRDness in distinct sarcoma histotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, two members of the Fanconi anemia core complex, FANCA and FANCB,t h eTP53 regulator MDM2,t h e tumor suppressor PTEN, cell cycle checkpoint regulators RAD1 and CHEK1, DNA damage and replication proteins ATM, RPA1 and H2AFX completed the list of the 10 top altered HRR genes in the TCGA-SARC cohort. Our genomic analyses are in line with recently published work (Gounder et al, 2022;N a c e vet al, 2022)t h a t described molecular patterns and genomic instability signatures in distinct sarcoma histotypes using a large cohort of sarcoma patients. In contrast to their findings, we identified a significant number of gene alterations in an extended HRR gene set, thus contributing to elucidate potential molecular mechanisms for HRDness in distinct sarcoma histotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this regard, an example is the case of MFS and UPS representing two separate STS entities previously grouped under the name of malignant fibrous histiocytoma that are both characterized by the unavailability of both diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and generally harbor highly complex karyotypes [ 11 , 12 ]. Moreover, the lack of predictive biomarkers that could guide physicians in the therapy selection represents a critical issue in the clinical management of STS, including these two entities [ 13 ]. In this work, we took advantage of an integrated approach combining the translational strength of patient-derived primary cultures as a powerful tool for the study of pathophysiology and of the pharmacological profile of STS, together with genomic profiling techniques in order to identify promising biomarkers for the stratification of MFS and UPS patients for the most suitable chemotherapeutic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From UCSC (see Footnote 5) database we had downloaded a standardized pan-cancer dataset: TCGA Pan Cancer (PANCAN, N = 10,535, G = 60,499). Based on the previously extracted expression data and screened samples, we obtained MSI (Microsatellite instance) scores of each tumor from the previous study ( Gounder et al, 2022 ). Next, the MSI and gene expression data of the samples were integrated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%